Kolkata Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.V.S. Marwari Hospital Vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side APO NO. 119 OF 2008 APOT. NO. 29 OF 2006 WP. No. 2392 OF 2001 T. No. 871 of 2001 G.A. 4708 OF 2001 S.V.S. Marwari Hospital ...Appellant. -Versus- State of West Bengal and others. ...Respondents. For the appellant: Mr. Partha Dutta, Mr. Modhusudan Roy.For the respondent no. 3: Mr. Asish Kumar Das. Present:The Hon'ble Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee AndThe Hon'ble Justice Kalidas Mukherjee.Date: December 15, 2011. Dictated Order The Court: This is an appeal against judgment and order dated April 7, 2005 passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in W.P. No. 2392 of 2001. By the order impugned, the Hon'ble Single Judge dismissed an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ('the said writ petition' in short) and upheld the award passed by the learned 2 Judge, First Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal, in case no. VIII-124 of 1999. By order dated June 25, 1999, the Government of West Bengal referred an industria...
Kesoram Industries Limited Vs. Employees State Insurance
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Appeal No. 152 of 1996 With W.P. No. 1992 of 1995 Kesoram Industries Limited ...Appellants. -Versus- Employees State Insurance Corporation and others. ...Respondents. For the appellants: Mr. Siddhartha Mitra, Mrs. Pooja Mitra. For the respondents: Mr. Subal Mitra, Mr. S. Sengupta.Present:The Hon'ble Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee AndThe Hon'ble Justice Kalidas Mukherjee.Date : December 15, 2011. Dictated Order The Court: This is an appeal against judgment and order dated April 24, 1996 passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge of this Court disposing of an application under 2 Article 226 of the Constitution of India ('the writ petition in short'), inter alia, directing the writ petitioners to refer the disputes involved in the said writ petition to the Employees' Insurance Court under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 ('the said Act of 1948' in short) within one month from the date of the said ...
M/S. Indo Arya Central Transport Vs. Balaram Naskar and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTAAppeal from its Constitutional Jurisdiction Original Side GA. 3736 of 2007 APOT. 603 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003M/s. Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Balaram Naskar and others. GA. 3760 of 2007 APOT. 609 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003M/s. Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Nitya Gopal Choudhury and others. GA. 3761 of 2007 APOT. 610 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003M/s Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Trityest Paul and others. GA. 3762 of 2007 APOT. 611 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003M/s Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Kailash Nath Shukla and others. GA. 3763 of 2007 APOT. 612 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003M/s Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Paresh Nath Upadhyay and others. 2 GA. 3764 of 2007 APOT. 613 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003 M/s Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Munshi Ram Yadav and others. GA. 3765 of 2007 APOT. 614 of 2007 WP. 1259 of 2003 M/s Indo Arya Central Transport Limited -Versus- Nabakishore Barikp and ...
353/2008
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-13-2011
1 PLA No. 353 of 2008 In the High Court at Calcutta Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction -- In the Goods of : Jai Singh Singhi alias Jay Singh Singhi (Deceased)Before:The Hon'ble Justice I.P. MUKERJIDate: 13th December, 2011 Appearance: Mr.P. Sancheti,Advocate The Court: I have considered the Report of the Registrar, Original Side dated 2nd December, 2011. I have also considered the Report of the Senior Master and Official Referee dated 1st December, 2011. According to the Report, the Registry of our Court had been instructed by the Hon'ble Interlocutory Judge to be very strict with Wills which have not been executed in accordance with section 63(c) and section 281 of the Indian Succession act, 1925. It is also mentioned in these reports that the Hon'ble Judge had directed the department to act in accordance with law. These instructions do not mean that the Registry officials will adjudicate by scrutinizing the Will or the accompanying affidavit of an attesting witness as to whethe...
Suresh Kumar Agarwal Vs. R. Piyarellal International Pvt.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-13-2011
ACO 66/2010 ACO 164/2011 APO No. 84 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SURESH KUMAR AGARWAL Versus R. PIYARELLAL INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. and; ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 13th December, 2011. Appearance: Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Adv., appears. Mr. S.N. Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., appears. The Court : A.C.O. No.66 of 2010 is a petition for review of an order dated March 16, 2010. The other application, A.C.O. No.164 of 2011, is by the review petitioner seeking certain interim orders. The fight is between two brothers and groups of concerns headed by the two brothers that have been referred in the order dated March 16, 2010 as the Ramesh group and the Suresh group. The review has been sought by the Suresh group. The order under review is one that was passed on appeals under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, carried by the rival groups from an order passed by the Company Law Board. In proceedings instituted under, inter a...
Re: Bengal Dooars National Tea Co. Vs. Unknown
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
CP No. 107 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE In the matter of: RE: BENGAL DOOARS NATIONAL TEA CO. LTD. And DINESH AGARWAL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHOKE KUMAR DASADHIKARI Date : 9th December, 2011. Appearance: Mr. Utpal Bose, Adv. Mr. Susanta Dutta, Adv. Mr. Amitesh Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Manju Bhuteria, Adv. The Court : This winding up application was filed by the petitioning creditor, Dinesh Agarwal. It was contended by Mr. Bose that an agreement was entered into on 21st December, 2005 between the petitioner and the company for getting financial accommodation to the tune of Rs.25,00,000/-. Accordingly, the petitioner paid an accommodation loan of Rs.24,16,875/-. The said agreement provides that after making such advance the company being the first party in the agreement would despatch a total quantity of 110000 kg of CTC Teas to the petitioner and the petitioner would be at liberty to send teas to auction centers and in 2 case of private sale then the company would...
Shridhar Issar Vs. Bharnobari Tea and Industries Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-09-2011
1Order Sheet Serial No........ IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE In the matter of : G.A. No. 1245 of 2010 G.A. No. 348 of 2010 C.S. No.126 of 2007 SHRIDHAR ISSAR Vs BHARNOBARI TEA and; INDUSTRIES LTD.Before:The Hon'ble JusticeINDIRA BANERJEE Mr. Asish Chakravarti Mr. Mohit Gupta .......for the plaintiff. Mr. Amitesh Banerjee Mr. Reetabrata Mitra .......for the defendant. Date: 09.12.2011 JUDGMENT This application by Master's Summons dated 9 th April, 2010 has been taken out by the plaintiff under Chapter XIII A of the Original Side Rules of this Court, for final judgment and decree against the defendant, for recovery of a sum of Rs.17,14,242/- together with further interest at the rate of 15% per annum from 1 st April, 2007 until payment and other consequential reliefs. The plaintiff filed the suit being C.S. No.126 of 2007 against the defendant claiming inter alia a decree for Rs.17,14,242/-, interest and costs. 2 The plaintiff claims to...
Sabita Rani Agarwal Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-08-2011
AP No. 383 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SABITA RANI AGARWAL Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Appearance Mr. Ahin Chowdhury, Sr. Advocate Mr. Satarup Banerjee, Advocate BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 8th December, 2011. The Court : The respondent is not represented even at the second call. No affidavit-in-opposition has been filed despite the respondent obtaining directions therefor though a copy of a proposed affidavit has been forwarded to the petitioner. The petitioner refers to the arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties that recognizes that the Chief General Manager of BSNL Telecom Factory, Calcutta or the officer entrusted the duties of Chief General Manager would take up a reference or appoint another as arbitrator. The contract related to the supply of goods by the petitioner to the respondent. As is evident from an order dated April 24, 2009, passed on an application under Articl...
Shri Ramji Yadav Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-08-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE A. P. No. 29 of 2011 SHRI RAMJI YADAV VERSUS UNION OF INDIA and; ANR.BEFORE : The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE_________________________________________________________________________ Date: December 8, 2011_________________________________________________________________________ Appearance Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Mayukh Maitra, Adv. This is the usual scrap dealer's application hoping to make something out of nothing. But however prejudiced one may be, the rule of law that guides our society and is at the heart of the Constitution does not permit an impressionistic judgment to be rendered before the perceived recalcitrant is afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case. In any event, the scope of the present request under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is also restricted. This petitioner participated at an auction for purchase of some condemned wagons. The earnest mon...
State of West Bengal Vs. K. Banerjee and Bros
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-07-2011
AP No. 103 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction STATE OF WEST BENGAL Versus K. BANERJEE and; BROS. BEFORE:The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEEDate : 7th December, 2011. Appearance: Mr. Samrat Sen, Adv. Mr. P. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Bhargav Mitra, Adv. Mr. Amitava Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Navojit Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Jeenia Rudra, Adv. The Court : The challenge to an arbitral award is on a short question. The State, with a petition littered with its trade mark errors, charges that the respondent contractor was not entitled to any money in excess of an increase of 15 per cent over the contract value, and since the contractor had unequivocally undertaken not to charge any amount over such additional figure of 15 per cent, the award is without basis. The State says that upon the arbitrator holding that the undertaking furnished by way of a letter dated April 17, 1998, did not amount to novation of the contract between the parties, he disregarded the effect of the under...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »