Kolkata Court May 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arnab Chatterjee Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-05-2010
Ashim Kumar Roy, J.1. This criminal revision is directed against an order passed by a Sessions Court in a criminal revision reversing an order passed by the Trial Court in connection with a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, whereby the said Court rejected the opposite party/wife's prayer for maintenance.2. Heard the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the parties. Perused the orders of the Court belows.3. In the case at hand, the marriage has not been disputed. However, according to the wife/opposite party that after she being dropped at her parents home in spite of repeated requests she was not taken back by her husband. It was her further case she has no mean to maintain herself and now living at the mercy of her parents and the petitioner/husband in spite of sufficient means neither took any information about her nor maintained her. Whereas it is the case of the husband that the wife/opposite party has left her matrimonial home on the plea of lookin...
Sri Bankim Chandra Kundu Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-05-2010
Ashim Kumar Roy, J.1. At the instance of the present petitioner a proceeding under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was instituted before the Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ghatal on 25.2.2010, when the Learned Magistrate made the following orders;25-2-10The petitioner file a petition Under Section 144 Cr.P.C. Heard the Ld. Lawyer for the petitioner.Considered.O/C Ghatal P.S. is directed to cause a local enquiry into the petition and report.He is also asked to maintain peace and see that no construction of building etc. runs on the suit plot in the meanwhile until further order. B.L.R.O. Ghatal for local enquiry and report with ROR status by 22-3-10.Sd/P.K. PaulExecutive Magistrate, GhatalThe private opposite parties challenged the said order in a criminal revision before the Learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipur whereupon the Learned Sessions Judge, on March 3, 2010 admitted the said criminal revision called for the L.C.R. and granted stay till March 24, 2010. The...
Prasad Chandra Paul Vs. Sinha Multilevel Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-05-2010
Ashim Kumar Roy, J.1. Invoking Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner moved the instant criminal revision for quashing of a complaint relating to an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2. The grounds raised in this application in support of prayer for quashing are as follows;(a) The notice of demand was not sent within 30 days from the receipt of intimation from the bank.(b) The complainant in the affidavit-in-chief although claimed to have come to know about the dishonour of cheque on January 24, 2009, but in his complaint it was stated that he came to know the cheque was dishonoured on January 14, 2009.(c) The complaint is purely harassive.3. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made on behalf of the complainant. In a case where the question is one of quashing of a complaint, the only thing that Court has to see whether on the face of the allegations the offence has been made out or not. According to the pe...
Ansar Ali Khan Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2010
Debasish Kar Gupta, J.1. This writ application is directed against the appointment of the respondent No. 6 as M.R. Dealer at Village - Pukuria, Post Office- Baganda, Police Station-Shyampore under Dhandali Gram Panchayet, District Howrah.2. One Abdul Rashid Khan was the M.R. Dealer at Village - Pukuria, Post Office - Bangada, Police Station- Shyampore under Dhandali Gram Panchayet, District - Howrah. He surrendered his licence of the above M.R. Dealership to the respondent authority in the year 1999. Consequent thereupon the consumers of the above M.R. shop were tagged with another M.R. Dealer.3. A notice dated July 1, 2005 was issued by the respondent No. 4 inviting applications from the eligible persons to issue licence in respect of the above M.R. Dealership. The petitioner and the respondent No. 6 applied in response to the above notice amongst other eligible persons. After conducting enquiry, the respondent No. 5 submitted his report in respect of all the participants recommending...
Chandan Kumar Maity Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2010
Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has contended that he is a owner of a piece of agricultural plot of land bearing No. 170 of Talda Mouza under Sabang Development Block in the District of Paschim Medinipore by purchase in 2006. He installed a submersible pump for supply of water to the said agricultural plot of land before coming into force of the West Bengal Ground Water Resources (Management Control and Regulation) Act, 2005 with the permission of the Senior Geologist, Division No. 1, State Water Investigation Directorate, Water Investigation and Development Government of West Bengal. He submitted an application being No. AD/07/(06-07)/Agr dated 11.10.2006 on the basis of which the respondent No. 5, The Station Manager, Sabang Group Electricity Supply, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, has offered a quotation demanding a sum of Rs. 1,57,935/- only fur such supply connection. He deposited the amount on 28th May, 2007 against ...
Dr. (Professor) Tapan Kumar Biswas Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-03-2010
Ashim Kumar Banerjee J.1. State wanted to fill up the post of Director, Bangur Institute of Neurology. The State invited applications from the eligible candidates. Altogether eight candidates participated in the selection process. They were-1. Professor Tapan Kumar Biswas2. Professor Parimal Tripathi3. Professor Shyamapada Ghorai4. Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyaya5. Professor Prasanta Kumar Gangully6. Professor Shyamal Kumar Das7. Professor Bhagabati Charan Mohanty8. Professor Kalyanbrata Bhattacharya 2. Professor Shyamapada Ghorai was selected in the selection process being successful therein.3. Being aggrieved, professor Tapan Kumar Biswas, the applicant, above named, approached the State Administrative Tribunal inter alia questioning the selection process. The Tribunal vide judgment and order dated September 5, 2008 dismissed the said application. The Tribunal observed that the petitioner did not score any mark regarding second item of the score sheet and regarding item public...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›