Kolkata Court August 2009 Judgments

Smt. Shampa Mukherjee Vs. Sri Pranab Mukherjee

Court: Kolkata

Prasenjit Mandal, J.1. This first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sixth Court, District - South 24 Parganas at Alipore in Matrimonial Suit No. 47 of 1996 whereby the learned Additional District Judge decreed the suit against the wife/appellant.2. The respondent filed the suit for annulling the marriage by a decree of nullity under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 alternatively for judicial separation under Section 10 of the said Act. The husband/respondent and the wife/appellant were married according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies on 3rd June, 1996 after negotiation. Thereafter, they lived together. On the night of Phoolsajya, that is, on 05.06.1996 the husband/respondent discovered that the wife/appellant did not possess breasts like those of a female person and she had a black spot line on her back. On noticing such deformities, he informed his mother of the fact next morning. The marri...

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Sk. G ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2009Cal287

1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. We have also perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge. It appears that by letter dated 10th November, 2005, the consumer informed the Station Manager, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. that the meter provided to him for the purpose of recording consumption of electricity had got burnt. He made a request for replacement of the meter as also for submission of quotation for the purpose of installation of new meter. On the basis of this request, the meter was inspected. The quotation was issued on 11th November, 2005. The payment was made on 14th November, 2005. The new meter was duly installed. The consumer continued to run his husking mill without any let or hindrance. On 5th July, 2008, the consumer was informed through a letter that an inspection had been held on 4th July, 2008 and pilferage of electricity had been detected. This was challenged by the consumer in Writ Petition No. 18521 (W) of 2008.2. W...