Skip to content

Kolkata Court October 2009 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 23 2009

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Renuka Saha and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-23-2009

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This appeal and the cross-objection are directed against an award dated June 19, 2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal and Additional District Judge, Sixth Fast Track Court, Alipore, South-24 Parganas, in M.A.C. Case No. 44 of 2007 thereby disposing of an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act filed by the cross-objectors thereby directing the Insurance Company to pay compensation of Rs. 17,81,380/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application till payment.2. Being dissatisfied, both the Insurance Company and the claimants have come up before this Court by filing the appeal and the cross-objection respectively.3. According to the claimants, on August 1, 2003, the victim, born on April 1, 1953, was travelling by an auto-rickshaw which was hit by a Tata Mini-truck resulting in the death of the victim. There is no dispute that the mini-truck was insured by the National Insurance Company Ltd., the appel...


Oct 19 2009

Descon Ltd. Vs. Dpsc Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-19-2009

S. Balasubramanian, Chairman 1. The petitioner-DESCON holds 32.31 per cent. shares in the first respondent-company, viz., DPSCL. The second respondent-andrew (AYCL) holds 7.12 per cent.; its group companies-respondents Nos. 3 and 4, collectively hold 8.08 per cent. shares and the financial institutions-respondents Nos. 5, 6 and 7, collectively hold 42.56 per cent. shares. andrew had become a sick company and in the scheme framed by the BIFR for revival, one of the stipulations was that andrew should disinvest its investments in other group companies. In view of this stipulation, andrew has to disinvest its holding of 7.12 per cent. in DPSCL. Accordingly, it had initiated steps for disinvestment of these shares. The financial institutions and the third and fourth respondents holding shares have also joined in the exercise of disinvestment. Thus, the total percentage of shares that has come for disinvestment is 57.76 per cent. DESCON has challenged this proposed sale as oppr...


Oct 13 2009

Sukriti Dutta Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-13-2009

Biswanath Somadder, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed by one Sukriti Dutta, claiming himself to be the General Secretary of the Naba Jubak Sangha, a Puja Committee/Club/Association of 69, Sitaram Ghosh Street, P.S. Amherst Street, Kolkata-700009, as described in the cause-title.2. The immediate cause of the writ petitioner for approaching the writ Court are two notices; one dated 5th October, 2009 from the Officer-in-Charge of the Amherst Street Police Station addressed to Sri Bikash Bhattacharjee, President of the Naba Jubak Sangha Kali Puja Committee and another dated 8th October 2009 from the Officer-in-Charge, West Bengal Fire and Emergency Services, Central Avenue Fire Station, addressed to the Secretary of Naba Jubak Sangha.3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner submits that Naba Jubak Sangha is an old and established Puja Committee which is organizing Kali Puja for fifty one long years. This year would be its fifty second year. Learned S...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial