Kolkata Court February 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Krishna Bera and ors. Vs. Sri Prabir Pramanik and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: (2007)2CALLT484(HC)
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. By this appeal the appellants above-named before us have impugned the Judgment and order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court at Barasat in O.S. No. 12 of 1995 whereby and whereunder the probate to the last Will and testament of late Binoy Krishna Pramanik has been granted. The short fact of the case which has given rise to this probate proceedings is stated hereunder.2. The testator, one Binoy Krishna Pramanik, since deceased, before his death that took place on 12th November, 1988, is said to have executed his last Will and testament dated 13th July, 1988 and the same was registered on the same date. The applicant viz. the first respondent Prabir Pramanik was appointed as executor along with his mother Smt. Kamala Pramanik. It is alleged that because of inaction on the part of Kamala Pramanik, Prabir Pramanik applied for grant. It appears from the affidavit-of-assets that the testator has left a considerable properties which consists ...
Bengal Dental College and Research Institute Vs. the State of West Ben ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: (2007)2CALLT587(HC)
Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J.1. The petitioner is a registered society. It is aggrieved by the decision of the Director of Medical Education and Ex Officio Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal dated August 24, 2004, which is: 'The rule is laid down by Dental Council of India - It is further certified that in case the appellant fails to create infrastructure for the Dental College as per Dental Council of India norms and fresh admissions are stopped by the Dental Council of India, the StateGovt. shall take over the responsibility of the students already admitted in the college with permission of the Central Govt.' - in this regard it may be stated that we can not comply with the said rule and we can not take any responsibility of the proposed Dental College at present accordingly, on the event you fail to create necessary infrastructure.'2. With a view to establishing a dental college the petitioner submitted the requisite application for permission o...
iswar Prasad Bhattacharya Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)CHN791
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. The above writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:(a) A writ in the nature of the mandamus commanding the respondents concerned,(i) To consider the Annexure 'P-1' collectively containing the grievances of the petitioner being an ex-military person for not providing any facilities, amenities and services as per Government rules;(ii) Not to encourage the respondent authorities to extort money from the petitioner;(iii) To consider this instant application on top priority because of rehabilitation venture has been damaged by the respondents;(iv) Prayed for setting aside all the earlier illegal judgments and consider Annexure 'P-l' collectively for issue of appropriate orders;(v) To follow the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Part-B and Part-C of Schedule-1 of Section 3 of West Bengal Additional Tax and One-time Tax on Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 and amendment Act, 1992, 2004 and thereto;(vi) Stoppage of registration of omnibuses 'Contra...
Mamoni Bhakat Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-01-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)CHN141
Sadhan Kumar Gupta, J.1. This revisional application has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr. PC praying for quashing of the proceeding of Nabadwip P.S. Case No. 118(10) of 2004, as pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Nabadwip.2. Case of the petitioner is that the opposite party No. 2 submitted a written complaint to the O/C, Nabadwip P.S. on 6.10.2004 stating therein that his daughter Shipra Bhakat, aged about 19 years and who is a handicapped lady was called by Raju Bhakat 5/6 months before, in his house and raped her. Due to this, Shipra Bhakat became pregnant. As accused Raju threatened Shipra, so she could not disclose the matter earlier. In the meantime Raju assured Shipra that he would marry her. Two months after the incident, Raju took Shipra to one Manik Das, a quack of the village for the purpose of abortion. He administered some medicines to Shipra, but even thereafter the condition of Shipra became serious and as such, the de facto complainant informed t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›