Skip to content

Kolkata Court February 2006 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 02 2006

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. CavIn Kare Limited and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-02-2006

Reported in: (2006)3CALLT431(HC)

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. Both the aforesaid two applications and connected interlocutory applications are heard together and are disposed of by this common Judgment and order. Both the two contempt applications have arisen out of an undertaking given by the respondents dated 18th of July, 2000 in Suit No. 17 of 2000 and G.A. No. 276 of 2000. The petitioner herein being a registered patentee approached this Court with the aforesaid action alleging infringement of patent by the defendant. Cavin Kare Limited. In the said suit appropriate interlocutory application was taken out by the plaintiff and this Court granted appropriate interlocutory relief. During pendency of the suit and the connected interlocutory applications the parties themselves compromised outside the Court and put in terms of settlement or compromise. In the terms of settlement written undertaking was recorded. On the aforesaid date undertaking was also given before this Court apart from having recorded and signed the ...


Feb 01 2006

Sk. Nur Alam Vs. Director, College of Engineering and Management and o ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-01-2006

Reported in: 2006(3)CHN291

Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J.1. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the committee dated March 10, 2004 dismissing appeal preferred by his father feeling aggrieved by the order of the Director, College of Engineering and Management, Kolaghat, dated October 28, 2003 expelling the petitioner by way of punishment imposed under provisions of the West Bengal Prohibition of Ragging in Educational Institutions Act, 2000, Section 6.2. Alleging that on the night of October 20, 2003 the petitioner along with five other students of the college indulged in ragging to six junior students of the college, proceedings were initiated against him and his companion students under provisions of the West Bengal Prohibition of Ragging in Educational Institutions Act, 2000.3. After giving the petitioner reasonable opportunity to defend himself, and after making necessary inquiry, the authority found the petitioner and his companion students guilty of the charges of ragging, and recommended permanen...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial