Kolkata Court June 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asoke Kumar Himmatsinghka Vs. Rajendra Kumar Himmatsinghka and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-07-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)CHN353
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against Order No. 66 dated October 12, 2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ninth Court at Alipore, District South 24-Parganas in Title Suit No. 100 of 1997. By the order impugned the learned Trial Judge stayed all further proceedings in the said suit till the disposal of P.L.A. No. 166 of 1995 pending before this Court.2. Title Suit No. 100 of 1997 has been instituted by Asoke Kumar Himmatsinghka, the petitioner in this application, for partition of premises No. 68/1/A, Purna Das Road, Police Station - Lake Place, Kolkata - 700029. The plaintiff claimed undivided half share of the said premises.3. Originally Jamunadevi Himmatsinghka, since deceased, and Siriya Devi Himmatsinghka, since deceased, were the owners of the said premises in equal shares. The said Jamunadevi Himmatsinghka died on January 22,1976. Under her Will dated January 9, 1975, she bequeathed her undi...
Shyam Narayan Singh Vs. Arup Ratan Paul and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-07-2005
Reported in: (2005)3CALLT339(HC),2005(3)CHN501
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against judgment and order dated November 25, 2004 passed by the learned Judge, Eleventh Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Civil Revision Case No. 37 of 2004 reversing Order No. 119 dated July 26, 2004 passed by the learned Judge, Fourth Bench, Presidency Small Causes Court, Calcutta in Ejectment Suit No. 672 of 2000.2. The defendant is the petitioner in this application. The predecessor-in-interest of the substituted plaintiffs, the opposite parties in this application instituted, an ejectment suit being No. 641 of 1992 in the City Civil Court at Calcutta, which was eventually transferred to the Presidency Small Causes Court, Calcutta and has been renumbered as Ejectment Suit No. 672 of 2000.3. The learned Trial Judge by order dated July 26. 2004 disposed of an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the defendant/petitioner holding, inter alia, that th...
Shyamapada Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-07-2005
Reported in: (2005)3CALLT177(HC)
Asim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. On November 17, 1971, the writ petitioner was apppinted as primary teacher in Rahimtola Primary School in the district of Malda. Subsequently, he was transferred to Dharampur ' Primary School under the same district.2. On June 01, 1974, a criminal case was initiated at the instance of the District Inspector of School Primary Education), Malda as against like writ petitioner on the, allegation that, he obtained employment by producing fake certificate, On April 21, 1976, he was placed under suspension. Ultimately, he was discharged from service on June 22, 1977. However, no regular departmental proceeding was had as against the writ petitioner by the Primary School Council.3. On January 28, 1998, after about 22 years of initiation of the said criminal proceeding, the writ petitioner was acquitted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda from the said criminal case on the ground that the prosecution failed to produce any witness in support of the complaint case. ...
Babaji Automotive Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ARBLR566(Cal),2005(4)CHN74
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against an order dated January 24, 2005 passed by the sole arbitrator. By the order impugned, the arbitrator held that he had jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties.2. The petitioner namely, Surujit Saha, the sole proprietor of Babaji Automotive, was appointed as a distributor of Servo Brand Lubricants of Indian Oil Corporation Limited. The parties have entered into an agreement and in terms of the agreements, the petitioner took delivery of such lubricants from Indian Oil Corporation Limited. The petitioner used to take lubricants on credit facility. It is alleged that the banker of the petitioner dishonoured several cheques issued by the petitioner when Indian Oil Corporation Limited presented those cheques for encashment.3. It is alleged that the lube distributorship agreement contains an arbitration clause requiring the parties to refer their ...
Anupama Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Year Ali Mallick and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)CHN150
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ('the said application' in short) against Order No. 41 dated April, 20, 2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division). Second Court at Baruipur, District: South 24-parganas in Title Suit No. 136 of 2001. By the order impugned the learned Trial Judge allowed an application filed by the defendant No. 1 and the affidavit evidence of Jiban Krishna Chowdhury, the plaintiffs' witness No. 1, was rejected.2. The said application arises out of a suit for permanent injunction. The trial of the suit has commenced and one Jiban Krishna Chowdhury filed his affidavit-evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs. It is stated that the said Jiban Krishna Chowdhury is the husband of the plaintiff No. 2 and he, also, holds power-of-attorney on behalf of the plaintiffs. The affidavit-evidence is filed in question and answer form. He has verified his statement as to true his knowledge and belief.3. The de...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›