Skip to content

Kolkata Court May 2005 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 02 2005

Grace Hill Tea Industry Vs. Tea Auction Limited and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-02-2005

Reported in: 2005(4)CHN71

1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties at length. We do not think it would serve any further purpose to keep this matter alive at this stage since the matter is only on the ground that the order which has been passed by the Hon'ble First Court allowing the application filed by the appellant/ petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 recalling the decree made under Order 12 Rule 6.2. It is true that the appellant did not appear when the matter was taken, up by the Hon'ble First Court and as such an exparte order/decree was passed. However, that facts need not be gone into at this stage since, the application was allowed filed by the appellant/petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 with a condition imposed on the appellant/petitioner by the Hon'ble First Court that the applicant should secure a sum of Rs. 37 lacs either in the form of bank guarantee or in cash within a period of 12 weeks from date and if such security is furnished, then the order passed by the Hon'ble First Court would st...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial