Kolkata Court May 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Sumit Chemicals Vs. Sri Gyan Nath Zutshi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-05-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT346(HC)
P. K. Sen, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of a tenant defendant and is directed against the judgment and decree passed by Sri S. K. Das, Additional District Judge. 6th Court, Allpore. reversing the Judgment and decree passed by Sri. S. Mukherjee, Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Allpore.2. In a suit by the plaintiff respondent for eviction of the defendant appellant, the plaintiff had alleged that defendant was a monthly tenant under him in the suit flat at a monthly rental of Rs. 2000/- payable according to English calendar month. The plaintiff reasonably and suitably requires the suit flat for his own use and occupation and for the members of his family as the plaintiff has no other suitable, reasonable accommodation elsewhere. The plaintiff is an Engineer under Kulglan D.C.P.L. and is now posted at Egypt He is scheduled to return to Calcutta soon. But he is not in a position to come to Calcutta as he has no other accommodation in Calcutta or anywhere. The plaintiff requires the s...
Pioneer Spring and Steel Concern (P) Ltd. Vs. Delta International Ltd. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT259(HC)
V.K. Gupta, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5th February, 1993 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in Extraordinary Suit No, 8 of 1990 whereby the application filed by the Respondent No. 1 in terms of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff was allowed on the basis of the direction issued by the learned single Judge that the plaint be forth with taken off the File. At the same time in the Order under appeal the learned single Judge also observed that the plaintiff/appellant would be entitled tomake an application under section 47 CPC for the purpose of protection of its rights.2. The brief facts leading to the filling of the appeal are that the plaintiff/ appellant claims to be in occupation of a portion of the 5th floor measuring about 2200 square feet in premises No. 4 Government Place (North) Calcutta (5th floor of the said premises). The case of the appellant is that since August 1970 and at all...
Punjab National Bank Vs. Commissioner, Sanchaita Investments and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2000
Reported in: [2002]112CompCas80(Cal)
V.K. Gupta, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated January 20, 1990, passed by the learned Commissioner, Sanchaita Investments, Calcutta, in the claim case filed by and on behalf of the Punjab National Bank against Sanchaita Investments. The brief facts leading to the filing of the appeal are that the appellant-Punjab National Bank filed a claim petition before the learned Commissioner for Sanchaita Investments (hereinafter to be called as 'the Commissioner') with respect to the demand of the appellant-bank for a sum of Rs. 26,50,000. It appears that Sanchaita Investments (hereinafter to be called 'the company') under an agreement dated May 11, 1981, agreed to purchase the 5th floor of a multi-storeyed building at No. 113, Park Street, Calcutta, along with car parking spaces for a consideration of Rs. 28,71,000 from one M/s. Anandi Lal Poddar and Sons Limited. The said transaction was completed after the aforesaid amount is stated to have been paid by the company to the ...
Kartick Chandra Ghosh Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-03-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Cal218
ORDERBhaskar Bhattacharya, J. 1. By this writ application the petitioner has challenged Memo No. ADH/ 24/636 dated Oct. 12, 1998 Issued by the West Bengal State Electricity Board thereby refusing to grant new electric connection to the petitioner so long 'no objection' is obtained from Public Health Engineering Directorate. 2. The petitioner applied for a new domestic connection in the required form before the Board on April 21, 1998. As mentioned above, by the memo impugned herein theBoard expressed its inability to give such connection for want of 'no objection' from the Public Health Engineering Directorate. 3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has come up with this application. 4. The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has contended that under the Indian Electricity Act there is no provision for getting such 'no objection' from Public Health Engineering Directorate when the petitioner has applied for domestic connection in the House owned by him. 5. The Board has ...
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Dilip Bhusan
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-03-2000
Reported in: (2000)IIILLJ955Cal
S.B. Sinha, J.1. This application is directed against the order dated September 28, 1999 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. Calcutta Branch, in O.A. No. 1180 of 1995 whereby and whereunder the writ application filed by the respondent herein was disposed of directing:'In view of the above, the case of the applicant, therefore, requires justifiably to be reconsidered afresh. If the cadre of Aerodrome Assistant and the posts of Aerodrome Assistant have been transferred to N.A.A. as stated in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the supplementary reply of the respondents then the application automatically becomes absorbed in the N.A.A. as part and parcel of the establishment of the N.A.A. from initial date of his deputation i.e. June 1, 1986 and there is no question of asking for any option in that case. If the respondents especially respondent No. 2 finds that it is not so then the cadre Aerodrome Assistant and the post of the applicant continues to exist under them and, therefore, he should...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›