Kolkata Court March 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Omraomal Goel Vs. Collector Under E.C. Act and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2000
Reported in: (2000)2CALLT432(HC)
S.B. Sinha, J. 1. This appeal is directed against a part of the judgment dated 21.4.90 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 13948 (W) of 1998 whereby and whereunder the learned trial Judge refused to direct return of the sale price of the essential commodities seized from the appellant and sold in a proceeding Initiated under section 6-C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Act for short). 2. The fact of the matter is not in dispute. 3. The appellant herein is proprietor of Sillguri Cereals Company which used to deal with rice and wheat. On or about 2.8.94, the competent authority Inspected the flour mills belonging to the appellant and seized certain quantities of rice and wheat kept therein as according to the said authority such storage was contrary to the provisions of the orders made under the Essential Commodities Act. A criminal case as also a confiscation proceeding, being E.C. Case No. 8/2 of 1994/1995 was initiated. in the criminal case, the appellant...
The Guardians Council and Sri Aurobindo Institute of Education and anr ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT45(HC)
M.H.S. Ansari, J.1. The instant writ application has been assigned to be heard by this Court by an order passed by His Lordship the Chief Justice dated 1.2.2000.2. The Guardians Council of Sri Auroblndo Institute of Education, a registered body of Association of Guardians of the students of the said Institution registered under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961 and its General Secretary are the petitioners 1 and 2 herein.3. The petitioners have questioned the circular dated 26.7.1999 whereby the Institute in question has enhanced the tuition fees from 1st September, 1999. The following scheduled of tuition fees for various classes have been made effective from 1st September, 1999 by the Impugned circular.'ClassPresent rate of Tuition Fee.Tuition Fee enhanced byEffective Tuition FeeSept. 1999(i) Nursery to KGRs. 185/-Rs. 80/-Rs. 265/-(ii) I to VRs. 185/-Rs. 90/-Rs. 275/-(iii) VI to VIIIRs. 185/-Rs. 125/-Rs. 310/-(iv) IX and XRs. 185/-Rs. 130/-Rs. 315/-(v) XI and XIIRs. 25...
Sukanta Mukherjee Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT147(HC)
M.H.S. Ansarl, J.1. By an order dated 10.2.98 of His Lordship the Chief Justice, the matter has been assigned to this Court.2. The petitioner in the instant writ application has questioned the advertisement dated 19.12.97 published by the respondent Indian Oil Corporation (for short IOC) for grant of dealership of retail outlet at Bidhannagar. The said retail outlet was reserved for woman. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the Impugned reservation in terms of the said advertisement is in violation of Article 14, 15(1) and 21 of the Constitution of India and also direction is sought for restraining the respondents from giving effect to the impugned reservation in terms of the said advertisement.3. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the said reservation, he is not entitled to make an application for grant of dealership in response to the said advertisement though he is otherwise qualified for making such application.4. When the writ application was moved, S.K. Sen, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›