Skip to content

Kolkata Court June 1998 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 05 1998

Shyam Sunder Sharma Vs. Superintendent of Directorate of Revenue Intel ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-05-1998

Reported in: (1998)2CALLT408(HC),1999(114)ELT28(Cal)

S. Narayan, J.1. This revisional petition is directed against the order dated 27.5.98 passed by the learned Chief Judge. City Sessions Court, Calcutta in Criminal Misc. Case No. 210 of 1998 rejecting the prayer for ball on behalf of the petitioner in connection with D.R.I. F.No. 61/Cal/APP/ 98 of Directorate of Revenue intelligence, Calcutta Zonal Unit, 8, Calcutta. The order is sought to be set aside invoking inherent power of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 and. In the alternative, it was also orally prayed to pass suitable order for ball under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973.2. Pursuant to an information received by the officers of Directorate of Revenue intelligence, Calcutta an investigation was initiated and it was being carried out with respect to the basic allegation that M/s. Associated industries were engaged in illegal importation of (1) RBD. Palmolln oil (ii) Mulberry Raw Silk (iii) HDPE (iv) Copper Cathode and evasio...


Jun 03 1998

Durgapur Projects Ltd. and anr. Vs. Graphite India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-03-1998

Reported in: AIR1998Cal319

Barin Ghosh, J.1. By the judgment and order under appeal a learned single Judge of this Court allowed three writ petitions and thereby set aside the revision of tariff made by the appellant No. 1, Durgapur Projects Ltd., with effect from 8th April, 1991, 1st November, 1993 and 10th February, 1994.2. The appellant No. 1 is a GovernmentCompany within the meaning of Companies Act,1956 and its entire shareholding is held by theGovernment of West Bengal. It has six ThermalPower Units for generation of electricity, all ofthem are situate in Durgapur. It is a generatingcompany within the meaning of the Electricity(Supply) Act, 1948. It supplies electricity toconsumers in the rural and industrial areas in andaround Durgapur. The excess power generatedby it, is sold to the West Bengal State ElectricityBoard.3. It being a generating company and not a lisensee, the appellant No. 1 required sanction of the Government of West Bengal to enable it to supply electricity to the public in terms of Secti...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial