Kolkata Court November 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sukesh Ranjan Dutta Chowdhury Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-03-1998
Reported in: (1999)3CALLT206(HC)
G.R. Bhattacharjee, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner challenges the order of his removal from service as well as the departmental appellate order and review order confirming such removal. He also prays for reinstatement in service.2. The petitioner was appointed as Sales Officer by the Manager (Administration) of the Fertiliser Corporation of India Ltd. (FCI. for short). Eastern Marketing Zone on 29.6.71. While the petitioner was serving in the Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. the said organisation was divided into five different organisations including the Hindusthan Fertiliser Corporation of India Ltd. with effect from 1st April, 1978. The Easterm Marketing Zone of the FCI was allocated to Hindusthan Fertiliser Corporation of India Ltd. (HFC. for short). All the employees working in the Eastern Marketing Zone were asked to give their option if they were willing to be transferred to the HFC with the stipulation that in case no consent was received by the stipulated date f...
Rama Chatterjee and anr. Vs. Somnath Ghosal and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-02-1998
Reported in: (1999)1CALLT254(HC)
D. B, Dutta, J.1. The present revislonal application is directed against the order Nos. 44 and 46 dated 5.6.98 and 8.6.98 passed in Title Suit No. 3500 of 1996 by the 11th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta whereby the application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with section 151 C.P.C. has been rejected. The suit is for recovery of Khas possession of certain properties described in Schedules A and B upon a declaration on that the defendant is a rank trespasser in relation to the said properties and also for a permanent Injunction restraining them from encroaching, upon and taking forcible possession of the properties described in Schedule C of the plaint. The plaintiff has sued in the capacity of the managing trustee to the estate of Shri Shri Annapurna Thakurani and Shri Shri Durgamata Thakurani. It is alleged on behalf of the plaintiff that the suit properties are all comprised within the said trust estate created in the year 1891. The defence case is that these properties are not compr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›