Kolkata Court May 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dwijabar Alias Dwijapada Halder (Deceased) Represented by Legal Heir S ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-06-1996
Reported in: (1997)1CALLT114(HC)
Nisith Kumar Batabyal, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Bankura in Session Case No. 2 of December, 1984 (S.T. No. 2 of Feb., 1985). The learned Judge by the impugned order sentenced the appellant (Dwijabar alias Dwijapada now deceased) to suffer R.I. for four years and pay a fine of Rs. 200/- i.d., to suffer R.I. for one month more for an offence under Section 326 IPC. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 27.6.83 at about 10.00 a.m. over some quarrel, the sons of appellant Dwijabar were abusing Amarendra Palit and his sons in filthy language. Tapan S/o Amarendra protested when the appellant and his son, Pradip came out with an iron crow-bar and the appellant threw the spear which struck Tapan at the upper part of his abdomen causing a bleeding injury. Amarendra rushed out of his house and held Dwijabar and detained him till the arrival of police from the local P.S. On ...
Gramophone Company of India Limited Vs. Shanti Films Corporation and O ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-02-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Cal63
ORDER1. On 21st August, 1986 an agreement was entered between the plaintiff and the defendant No. 1. The said agreement contains the following, amongst others, covenants: '1. This agreement shall be for the film 'SHATRU' year(s) commencing on the 2lst day of August 1986 and shall continue for ...X... successive periods of ...X... each on the same terms and conditions as are herein laid down unless the company terminates the agreement by giving notice in writing to the producer 60 days before the expiration of the initial or extended period. 2. For the purpose of this agreement the following words shall have the meanings set forth against them: 'WORK' shall mean any one or more of literary dramatic musical or artistic work as defined in the Copyright Act, 1957. 'RECORD' shall include a gramophone disc record, magnetic tape record (whether reel to reel, endless loop, in cassette or cartridge form or otherwise howsoever) or any other contrivance or appliance whatever bearing or used for e...
Nandita Roy (Nee Ghosh) Vs. Asish Kumar Roy
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-02-1996
Reported in: II(1996)DMC688
Sudhendu Nath Mallick, J.1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant wife against the judgment and decree dated 12.9.1989 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 14th Court, Alipore thereby dismissing her Matrimonial suit No. 39 of 1992 wherein she prayed for a decree of divorce against the husband respondent under the provisions of Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty, both mental and physical and desertion. The husband respondent contested the above suit in the Trial Court denying all the material allegation contained in the petition for divorce and his specific case was that the appellant wife sometime after her marriage developed illicit and adulterous relationship with one Sibapada Banerjee the husband of the respondent's elder sister which became a public scandal injuring the social position of the respondent and the members of his family but the petitioner wife i.e. the present appellant did not mend her ways and on her own consent th...
Sm. Nandita Roy (Nee Ghosh) Vs. Sri Asish Kumar Roy
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-02-1996
Reported in: (1996)2CALLT237(HC)
Sudhendu Nath Mallick, J.1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant wife against the Judgment and decree dated 12.9.89 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 14th Court, Alipore thereby dismissing her matrimonial suit No. 39 of 1992 wherein she prayed for a decree of divorce against the husband respondent under the provisions of Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty, both mental and physical and desertion. The husband respondent contested the above suit in the Trial Court denying all the material allegation contained in the petition for divorce and his specific case was that the appellant wife sometime after her marriage developed illicit and adulterous relationship with one Sibapada Banerjee the husband of the respondent's elder sister which became a public scandal injuring the social position of the respondent and the members of his family but the petitioner wife i.e. the present appellant did not mend her ways and on her own consent the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›