Kolkata Court December 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dulal Paul Vs. State of West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-04-1996
Reported in: (1997)1CALLT335(HC)
Debi Prasad Sircar-I, J.1. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 7-5-91 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Dinajpur. Balurghat in Sessions Case No. 22 of 1990 (S.T. No. 8 of 1990) of that court. 2. The case is over one of the most burning problem of those days, an alleged incident of bride killing. The appellant, Dulal and, the deceased, Sabita @ Arati married in 1988 AD in the month of Magh according to Bengali Calendar and they lived at Banamali in the house of one Birendra Nath Paul, alleged to be a distant relative of the appellant. On 4-9-89, in the morning the said Birendra called at the house of the defacto complainant and informed them that Sabita, the brother's daughter to defacto complaintant, died in the preceding evening. The uncle and the mother of the deceased rushed to the matrimonial home of Sabita @ Arati and found that her deadbody was laid stretched on the courtyard. They noticed marks of injuries on the body, an...
South Calcutta Hawkers Union and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and O ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-03-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Cal110
ORDER1. Heard the submissions of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ajit Kumar Panja, learned Advocate-General for the State of West Bengal and the learned Senior Counsel for the Calcutta Municipal Corportion, Mr. Anindya Mitra.2. This is a petition by the Association for South Calcutta Hawkers Union and individual persons being petitioners Nos. 2 to 13 alleging, inter alia, that they are the hawkers carrying on their trade or business on the pavemens of Rash Behari Avenue and Gariahat Road, South Calcutta, by setting up stalls and according to the writ petitioners they have fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India to carry out such trade and that as they have come to do their trade sometime before the year 1980 still they have a legitimate expectation that they would be allowed to do so and that as they have been allowed to do so the principle of promissory estoppel will come into play. While developing the points, Mr. Panja also invited ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›