Kolkata Court October 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Partha Sarathi Rej and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: (1997)2CALLT400(HC),(1999)IIILLJ1324Cal
Dibyendu Bhusan Dutta, J.1. The instant writ petition is directed against a tripartite settlement dated February 18, 1994.2. A union and its office bearer are the writ petitioners. The respondent No.3 company has a commercial establishment consisting of Accounts Dept., Personnel Dept., Engineering Purchase Dept., Drawing Office etc. attached to its manufacturing unit at Rishra. The petitioner union claims that it represents the majority of the employees of the respondent No.3 at Rishra. The commercial establishment of the Respondent company at Rishra was registered under the Shops and Establishments Act, 1963. For the employees of the commercial establishment of the respondent company at Rishra, the total weekly working hours were 36 while the total number of working days in a week was 5. Besides the petitioner union, there are two other unions operating at the Rishra unit of the Company viz. respondents No. 5 and 6. On the expiry of the long term settlement dated January 12, 1989, all...
SamsuddIn Mohalat
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: II(1997)DMC212
Nripendra Kumar Bhattacharyya, J.1. This is a combind application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, 1973 and under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of the delay. No ground has been made out showing the cause of delay. Be that as it may, the main revisional application is taken up for hearing alongwith the prayer for condonationo f delay I and is disposed of by the following order.2. Heard the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Falguni Sarkar being assisted by Mr. Srikumar Sinha. Considered the materials on record.3. This is a case arising out of an application under Section 125 of the Cr. P.C. filed by the wife-petitioner in the Trial Court wherein she alleged that after torture as she had fallen ill, she sent information to her father and her father took her back to his house. After treatment she came round and came to her matrimonial home only to be driven out again after assault. It was further alleged in the petition of the...
In Re: SamsuddIn Mohalat
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-01-1996
Reported in: I(1997)DMC584
Nripendra Kumar Bhattacharyya, J.1. This is a combined application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., 1973, and under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of the delay. No ground has been made out showing the cause of delay. Be that as it may, the main revisional application is taken up for hearing alongwith the prayer for condonation of delay and is disposed of by the following order.2. Heard the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Falguni Sarkar being assisted by Mr. Srikumar Sinha. Considered the materials on record.3. This is a case arising out of an application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the wife-petitioner in the Trial Court wherein she alleged that after torcher as she had fallen ill, she sent information to her father and her father took her back to his house. After treatment she came round and came to her matrimonial home only to be driven out again after assault. It was further alleged in the petition of the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›