Kolkata Court June 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradip Kumar Chatterjee Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-12-1995
Reported in: (1997)2CALLT4(HC)
Satya Brata Sinha, J.1. This application is directed against the order dated 10.5.89 as contained in annexure K to the writ petition whereby and whereunder the petitioner was dismissed from service as also the order dated 22.8.91 passed by the appellate authority.2. The fact of the matter shortly stated is as follows:-3. The petitioner at all material times was working as a clerk attached to the office of the Sub-divisional Officer, Barasat Ten criminal cases were instituted against the petitioner at the instance of one Sri Purnendu Bose, Treasury officer in February 1983. The petitioner was discharged from all the aforementioned criminal cases in terms of the provisions of Section 167(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as no charge sheet was filed within the statutory period. During the pendency of the aforementioned criminal cases, on 18th May, 1983 the petitioner was served with a chargesheet. The petitioner filed an application before the Enquiry Officer for stay of the departmen...
Oyatape Fibres Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-08-1995
Reported in: 1995(79)ELT4(Cal)
ORDERAjoy Nath Ray, J.1. The writ petitioners have pressed their case and the Customs Authorities have raised no substantial opposition to the way the case has been pressed.2. In brief the facts are these. Sometime in September 1994 Tarun Kumar Chatterjee, J. ordered to the effect that the goods of the writ petitioners be released on payment of customs duty and a requisite detention certificate acceptable to the Airport Authority do issue.3. The purport of the order would be that the goods would be released on payment of customs duty but no detention charges would have to be paid. The Customs Authorities issued an exemption certificate (see page 41) which was acceptable to the Airport Authorities.4. The goods were released on payment of duty.5. The procedure adopted however was, that the Airport charges, which were in effect disallowed by the learned Judge, were paid and refund thereof was to be obtained from the Airport Authority on the basis of the Court's order.6. The shed charges p...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›