Kolkata Court September 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oyatape Fibres Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-16-1994
Reported in: 1994(74)ELT509(Cal)
Tarun Chatterjee, J.1. The writ petitioners are traders in various types of dyes, dye intermediaries and other chemicals. The writ petitioners brought from a foreign supplier 300 Kgs. of 'Dispersed Dyes Pink' of German origin (hereinafter referred to as 'the goods') to Calcutta on or about 12th December, 1993. Upon arrival of the goods at the Calcutta Airport, the writ petitioners filed a Bill of Entry for home consumption on 17th of December, 1993 under Section 46 of the Customs Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') before the Customs Authorities at Calcutta for clearance and release of the goods. The goods were, however, not released but were detained by the Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, being the respondent No. 4 in this writ application, by passing an order of detention under Section 110 of the Act on December 23, 1993. On 30th of April, 1994, the writ petitioners received a draft show cause notice issued by the customs authorities without any numb...
Associated Design Planning Group Private Limited Vs. Prodosh Kumar Mul ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-14-1994
Reported in: (1995)1CALLT54(HC)
Nisith Kumar Batabyal, J.1. The Company, Associated Design Planning Group Private Ltd., incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its Registered Office at 99/5/5, Ballygunge Place, Calcutta has a nominal capital of Rs, 1,00,000.00. The Company was established for the following objects:(a) To carry on the business of consultancy services for Architectural, Planning, interior design and also to carry on the business of civil/structural, mechanical, electrical, environmental engineering/consultancy services;(b) To acquire by purchase, lease or otherwise, land, building estate or any such property for any tenure and develop construct or reconstruct, alter improve, decorate, furnish equip and maintain as any of the abovementioned business or establishment or shop, warehouses etc;(c) To lend money to such persons upon such terms and subject to such conditions as may seem expedient, not amounting to Banking;(d) To enter into any arrangement with any Government, or authorrity supre...
In Re: Renu Singh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-12-1994
Reported in: 1995(1)ALT(Cri)13,(1994)2CALLT335(HC),99CWN19
Rabin Bhattacharyya, J.1. The defacto complainant Renu Singh, the wife of the deceased Ranjit, has come up before this Court for cancellation of anticipatory bail dated 18.8.1994, granted by the learned Sessions Judge in charge, North 24-Parganas, in Criminal Misc Case No. 2274, in connection with Rajarhat Police Station Case No. 144 dated 7.7.1994, initially started under Section 306/34 of the IPC. But, subsequently a further section was added viz. Section 302 of the IPC for the Post Mortem report disclosing the death of Ranjit, a homicide.2. However, to appreciate the viability of the claim, a brief resume of the facts is essential. The facts :3. One Mohon Singh, since deceased, acquired substantial properties which included amongst others the factory and the landed properties. On his death, the properties left behind him devolved on his legal heirs. The death of Mohon dealt a death blow to the peace and happiness in the Singh's family for the dispute and dissension broke out amongst...
Collector of Customs Vs. Kussum Marodia
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-12-1994
Reported in: 1995(77)ELT808(Cal)
ORDERHence Ordered. Sd/- (Mukul Gopal Mukherjee, J.]23. In view of the difference between ourselves, however much minor the point of difference may be, we should direct the matter to be placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice for assignment of this matter before a learned third Judge. Let a xerox copy of this judgment be made available to the learned advocates on record for both the parties on usual undertaking....
Dr. Subhash Chandra Pratihar Vs. Mrs. Leena Chakraborty and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-10-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ707
ORDER1. This is an Application by the Petitioner under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the Opposite-Parties for deliberate and intentional violation of the orders dated 25th March, 1991 and 10th January, 1992 passed by Mahitosh Majumdar, J., since deceased, as His Lordship then was, in CO. No. 3386 (W) of 1991, in the circumstances stated therein. On the said Application being filed before the Court on 3rd June, 1992, Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J., by his Order dated 1st September, 1992 had directed the Opposite-Party No. 1, Mrs. Leena Chakraborty, Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal, to be present in Court on 8th September, 1992 at 2 P.M. and explain as to why appropriate proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act should not be drawn up against her for not complying with the aforesaid orders passed by this Court. The Learned Judge did not feel inclined to proceed against other Opposite-parties in the Contempt Application. The Contempt App...
Birbhum District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. All Bengal Cooperat ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-09-1994
Reported in: (1996)ILLJ138Cal
Ruma Pal, J.1. The subject matter of challenge in both these writ petitions is an Award passed by the Learned 5th Industrial Tribunal, made ex parte and published under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on January 11, 1991. The writ petitions have been filed by two Co-operative Banks. The Award determined diverse issues relating to the service conditions of the employees of Central Co-operative Banks and Land Development Bank and Urban Co-operative Banks.2. Both the writ petitioners had sought for setting aside of the award on substantially similar grounds. As such this judgment is disposing of both the writ petitions.3. According to the petitioners the award is bad because it was passed ex parte without any notice being served on the writ petitioners. It is submitted that the terms and conditions of service as sought to be fixed by the award would necessarily affect the writ petitioners particularly as far as the question of finances was concerned. It is prayed that the ...
Prabir Kumar Chatterjee Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-08-1994
Reported in: (1995)2CALLT332(HC)
Basudev Panigrahi, J.1. The writ petitioner, having been aggrieved, by an order of cancellation of retail vending licence passed by the authorities has approached the Court for quashing the same. The petitioner claims that their family, at least since the time of his father has been obtaining licence as a retail vender. His father obtained the licence as a retail vender who continued as such till his death. After his demise, even it was granted to his mother who died in the year 1977. From then on, the said licence in respect of mother, has been renewed and/or settled by the competent authority under the provisions of Rule 209 of the Consolidated Rules framed under Section 86 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and the Circular Notification made thereunder. His place of business has been delineated at village Sunderchack within Kulti P.S. District-Burdwan.2. It is claimed by the petitioner that some-times in the 2nd week of April, 1992, he went to his native village Jourgram where his othe...
Pankaj Guljarilal Gupta Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-08-1994
Reported in: 1995LC654(Calcutta),1995(75)ELT47(Cal)
Tarun Chatterjee, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has come up with a prayer for a direction upon the respondents to forthwith release the subject goods, namely, 5000 pieces of Taper Roller Bearings No. 32211 (of diameter 55 mm) in terms of the Order in Appeal passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) dated 8-4-1994 being annexure 'F' to the writ petition. The writ petition arises in this manner.2. The writ petitioner in due course of his business has imported 5000 pieces of Taper Roller Bearings No. 32211 (of diameter 55 mm) being the parts of power operated coal briquetting press machine for converting cellulosic waste materials into fuel briquettes from Czechoslovakia through their sole selling agent. After arrival of the consigned goods, the petitioner's clearing agent filed the necessary Bill of Entry bearing No. 1005 for home consumption on 16th March, 1993 along with other relevant documents for release of the goods. The case of the petitioner is that the Customs au...
Al-AmIn Seatrans Ltd. Vs. Owners and Party Interested in Vessel M.V. ' ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-07-1994
Reported in: AIR1995Cal169,(1995)1CALLT98(HC)
ORDER1. The instant application has been made by M/s. Loyal Shipping Pvt, Ltd., (hereinafter also referred to as 'the defendant') a company incorporated under the laws of the repubulic of Bangladesh, who is the owner of M.V, Loyal Bird, (hereinafter referred to as the 'said vessel'). M/s. Al-Amin Seatrans Ltd. which is also a company incorporated under the laws of Bangladesh, instituted the above Admiralty Suit and obtained an order dated 7th July, 1994, for arrest of the said vessel m.v. 'Loyal Bird'. Pursuant to the said order the said vessel was arrested while lying at the Haldia Docks. The said vessel was thereafter allowed by this Court to be shifted to the Port at Calcutta.2. One of the salient features of this case isthat the Chairman of the Board of Directorsof the plaintiff is also the chairman of theBoard 6f Directors of the defendant. TheManaging Director of the plaintiff is also theManaging Director of the defendant. Theonly other two directors of the plaintiff arealso, the...
Subrtapatra and ors. Vs. Director of Panchayat and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-07-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ115
ORDERNisith Kumar Batbyal, J. 1. Twenty-one Criminal Revisional Application involving common question of law have been taken up together for orders here.1A. In Criming Revision No. 434, of 1994 (Baidyanath Bose and Ors. v. State), the petitioner No. 1 is the Branch Manager of Hooghly District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Haripal Branch. Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are Cultivators. Other petitioners are doing various works. On 8-4-1983 the Chief Accountant of Hooghly District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. lodged a complaint at Chinsurah P. S. to the effect that the petitioner No. 2 along with the other petitioners committed cheating in respect of a huge sum of money by way of criminal conspiracy and forgery of documents. Accordingly, Chinsurah P. S. Case No. 4, dated 8-4-83 was started under Sections 468/420/120B of the IPC The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the High Court and some of them surrendered before the Ld. SDJM of 17-6-83 and the rest on 25-6-83. The final repor...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »