Kolkata Court February 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lina Sengupta and Another Vs. Sovarani Guha
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-01-1994
Reported in: AIR1995Cal152
ORDER1. This revisional application is directed against the Order No. 141 dated 8-9-1992 passed in T.S. No. 133 of 1982 by the learned Munsif, 4th Court, Sealdha by which an application under Section 11 of the West Bengal Court-fees Act, 1970 has been disposed of.2. Originally the suit is filed simpliciter for a decree of declaration and permanent injunction restraining the defendants from transferring the suit property and from making disturbances with regard to the peaceful possession thereof. The same has been filed by filing an application for amendment under Or. 6, R. 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure by which a dilation has been sought to be made in respect of averments contained in original paragraph 11 of the plaint and also for addition of new prayer being (bb) for recovery of the possession of B Schedule property which is a pieve and parcel of66decimeloflandin P.S. Belghoria. After the said amendment was allowed, the defendant filed an application under Section 11 of the West...
Kalindi Woollen Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-01-1994
Reported in: 1994(74)ELT827(Cal)
Ajit K. Sengupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 28th July, 1990 dismissing the writ application filed by the appellants herein challenging the validity and/or legality of a public notice bearing No. 122-ITC(PN)/88-91 dated 26th April, 1989 issued by the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, New Delhi, and an Import Trade Control Order No. 52/88-91 dated 28th April, 1989 issued by the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India.2. The facts giving rise to the instant appeal are as under :The appellant company has a factory at village Dhoom Manikpur, in the District of Ghaziabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh and the principal raw-materials required for running the said factory by the appellants is rags both woollen and synthetic as well as shoddy wool. Since, these raw-materials are in short supply in this country, these are allowed to be imported under the Open General Licence Scheme of the Government of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›