Kolkata Court August 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
India Foils Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-1991
Reported in: 1992(37)ECC74
Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present Rule was obtained on 16.5.80 by the writ petitioner praying inter alia for declaration that aluminum foils under Item No. 27(c) of the First Schedule of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 manufactured by the petitioner and exported under Bond under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is not liable and/or chargeable with any duty of excise whatsoever and for a Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to recall and/or rescind the Show Cause Notices dated 3.8.1979 and 20.9.79 and to forbear them from taking any step in terms of the said Show Cause Notice and/or give any direction for levy or assessment of any alleged differential duty in respect of the goods exported under Bond and for other consequential reliefs to restrain the respondents to pass any order for levy or assessment or taking any step relating to assessment. It is alleged that the petitioner No. 1 - Company carries on business, inter alia, of manufacturing and selling of aluminium foils. ...
Presidency Jute Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Fifth Industrial Tribunal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-06-1991
Reported in: (1994)IILLJ564Cal
Altamas Kabir, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 21st July, 1977, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Civil Rule No. 306(W) of 1973, dismissing the writ application of the appellant herein and upholding the award passed by the Fifth Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta.2. The appellant, as it appears from the writ petition, is a company which, at the material time, was engaged in the manufacture of jute goods and other products. Mcleod and Company Ltd., having its office at Mcleod House 3. Netaji Subhas Road, Calcutta - l, were the Secretaries and Treasurers of the appellant company. The case made out in the writ petition is chat since 1963/64, the Presidency Jute Mills, owned by the company, became an uneconomical unit. For the year ending 31st July, 1964, the company suffered a loss of about Rs. 5 lakhs. For the year ending 31st July 1965, the company made a profit of about Rs. 1 lakh. However, for the year ending 31st of July 1966, the company...
Sushanta Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. the Calcutta Municipal Corporation a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1991
Reported in: (1992)2CALLT314(HC)
Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed for an appropriate writ commanding the respondents to forbear from dealing with, disposing of and/or using for gains by exhibiting of advertisements in respect of the kiosks being 1000 in number lying installed on the road indicator steel poles on different road sites in the city of Calcutta and belonging to the petitioners and/or forfeiting the same to the prejudice and detriment of the petitioners. It is stated in details that the steel poles being 1000 in number which were erected by the petitioners vested in the Corporation as soon as the same were erected by the kiosks both illuminated and non-illuminated as fitted by the petitioners on the said steel poles remained the properties of the petitioners and the Corporation of Calcutta acquired no right, title and interest and if those were not used the petitioners were entitled to remove the same. According to the petitioners, each of the kiosks valued at Rs. 350/- at th...
Mackintosh Burn Limited and anr. Vs. Nu-built Construction Private Ltd ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1991
Reported in: (1992)1CALLT151(HC)
Khwaja Mohammad Yusuf, J.1. This is an application Under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the judgment dated 9th January, 1991 passed by the learned District Judge, North 24-Parganas, in Misc. Appeal No. 102 of 1990 was challenged by the defendants/petitioners to set aside the order of injunction granted by the learned District Judge in favour of the plaintiff. The learned Munsif, 3rd Court, Sealdah, by his order dated 1lth September, 1990 in T. S. No. 283 of 1990 refused to grant any order of injunction which was reversed by the learned District Judge. The petitioners filed a title suit against the defendants for permanent injunction restraining the defendant No. 1 from cancelling the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 and a permanent injunction upon defendants Nos. 3 and 4 not to start any work at the site of work or demolish or do anything in respect of the building made by the plaintiff; also a prayer was made restraining the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›