Kolkata Court April 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Sabita Dutta and anr. Vs. Someswar Pandey and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-1991
Reported in: (1992)1CALLT137(HC)
Monoranjan Mallick, J.1. This is an appeal against the Order dated 14th September, 1978 passed by the learned Judge, 9th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Misc. Case No. 368/78.2. Facts may be briefly stated as follows :-The predecessor-in-interest of the present appellants was a premises-tenant under the respondent No. 1 in respect of a portion of the premises No. 1A, Goabagan Street, Calcutta-6. The respondent No. 1 without serving any Summons upon the original tenant, Bejoy Kumar Dutta obtained an ex parte decree and on the basis of such ex parte decree delivery of possession was taken by the respondent No. 1 on 21.3.71 with police help.3. Bejoy Kumar Dutta thereafter filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P. Code on 26.3.71 and the decree was set aside on the ground that the same was obtained without serving any Summons upon the tenant, Bejoy Kumar Dutta. Late Bejoy Kumar Dutta thereafter filed an application Under Section 144 C.P. Code for restoration of possession and ...
Ghouri Adhikary (Smt.) Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-02-1991
Reported in: (1992)1CALLT148(HC),(1999)IIILLJ84Cal
A.K. Nayak, J.1. Tills revision application under Section 397 and 401 read with Section 482 Cr. P.C. is directed against an order dated July 10, 1981, passed by learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta, in case No. C/2088/81 taking cognizance of the offence under Section 85(a) and (g) of the E.S.I. Act against the accused-opposite party No. 3 and also under the said section read with Section 85-A of the said Act, against the present petitioner and accused-opposite party No. 4, thereon issuing process against them.2. Undisputedly, a complaint case as appearing from the petition of complaint Annexure 'A' was filed before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta, by the complainant-opposite party No. 1, Employees' State Insurance Corporation against accused persons, being described as the Managing Director and Directors of M/s. Metro Engineering Works (P) Ltd., which is factory, alleging that these accused-persons, being the principal employers as defined in Clause 17 of...
Smt. Kanika Das Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-02-1991
Reported in: (1992)1CALLT264(HC)
Mahitosh Majumdar, J.1. By this writ application the petitioner prays for a mandate upon the respondents concerned to withdraw, cancel and/or rescind the order of her transfer issued by the District Inspector of Schools (SE) North 24-Parganas-Annexure 'C' to the application from E.C. Block Primary School, Salt Lake, South Dum Dum Circle to Goalbati F.P. School, Sukantanagar and also for not allowing the respondent No. 5 to join as Head Teacher to E.C. Block Primary School (for short the said school hereafter).2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows :Since 1980 the petitioner has been discharging her functions as Head Teacher of the said school and due to her utmost sincere service from the very inception as Organiser Teacher the said school has earned reputation and produced a number of brilliant students. The petitioner being an Inter mediate with Basic training degree was initially appointed on transfer from Sirampore Circle to act as Organising Teacher-in-charge of C.A. Blo...
Anil Kumar Goswami Vs. the State of West Bengal Through the Secretary ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-01-1991
Reported in: (1991)2CALLT307(HC)
Mahitosh Majumdar, J.1. The short point involved in this writ application is as to whether the respondent has acted in terms of the order passed by this Court on March 23, 1988. The relevant portion of the order is as follows :-'The District Inspector of Schools (Secondary Education), Burdwan, is directed to proceed with the matter de novo and decide all issues involved by giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The concerned District Inspector of Schools is also directed to ask the School Authorities to produce the records and allow the petitioner to have an inspection of the same and thereafter the petitioner shall have the liberty to file his reply to the charge-sheet. After completion of production of documents and inspection thereof, the concerned authority shall deal with and dispose of the matter in effective manner. It is also ordered that the District Inspector of Schools shall allow the petitioner to file his written statement with the evidence for the purpose of vin...
Asiatic Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-01-1991
Reported in: 1993LC215(Calcutta),1992(57)ELT563(Cal)
Ruma Pal, J.1. The question involved in this case is whether the petitioner can avail of the concessional rate of duty under Heading of 84.66 of Section XVI of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The said Heading in so far as it is material read as follows :84.66(i) all items of... 40%***** ***** *****(d) auxiliary equipment, as well as all components (whether finished or not) or raw materials for the manufacture of the aforesaid items and their components required for the initial setting up of a unit, or the substantial expansion of an existing unit of a specified :1. Industrial plant:***** ***** *****Provided these are imported (whether in one or in more than one consignment) against one or more specific contracts, which have been registered with the appropriate Custom House in the manner prescribed by regulations which Central Board of Excise and Customs may make under Section 157 of the Customs Act, 1962 and such contract or contracts has or have been so registered before any order is ma...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›