Kolkata Court August 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sundar Malla Vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1990
Reported in: AIR1991Cal110
ORDER1. The petitioner moved this writ application against an order dated 25-7-88 under Memo. No. 2687 passed by the Sub-Divisional Controller of Food and Supplies, Alipore, whereby the M. R. allotment in favour of the petitioner has been suspended and the petitioner was directed to show cause why the M. R. Dealership should not be terminated.2. The relevant fact of this case is that the petitioner was appointed as Modified Ration Dealer under agreement entered into by andbetween the petitioner and the Government of West Bengal and on the basis of which the petitioner was carrying on the business of M.R. dealership which was engaged in distribution of Rice, Wheat, Sugar and R. S. Oil to the consumers as per allotment made by the Inspector (Food and Supplies), Joynagar II. The petitioner was appointed as Modified Ration Dealer in the year 1957 and since then was carrying on the said business. The relevant provisions of the said agreement are as follows :--'The Retailer immediately on re...
Sri Sasabindu Sahu and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1990
Reported in: (1991)2CALLT41(HC)
Khwaja Mohammad Yusuf, J.1. Both the Writ petitions were heard analogously and are disposed of by this judgment.2. The petitioners joined the Public Works Department in the scale of Rs. 135/- to Rs. 180/- in the year 1973. Thereafter they were directed to be promoted to the post of work Assistant under Work Charged Establishment in the scale of Rs. 300-10-400-15-565-20-665/- plus usual allowances and were posted by office order issued from Midnapure being No. 295 dated 21st December, 1985. They came to know that the said order of promotion was directed to be kept in abeyance until further orders vide order dated 6th January, 1986 issued by Respondent No. 4. Thereafter the order of keeping the promotion in abeyance was withdrawn and the petitioners were directed to be released from the present post and to report as Work Assistants in the new place of posting by order dated 8th January, 1986 and they joined the promotional post of Work Assistants. Again recently the petitioners came to k...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›