Skip to content

Kolkata Court April 1990 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 09 1990

Shyamal Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. Dilip Kumar Bose and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-09-1990

Reported in: (1991)1CALLT37(HC),94CWN950

Amulya Kumar Nandi, J.1. Two short points arise for consideration in this revision. viz. what is meant by repair within the meaning of Section 34 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, and whether one of the joint tenants or teaants-in-common can maintain an application under Section 34 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act hereinafter called the Act.2. One Benoy Krishna Bhattacharya was a tenant under the opposite parties Dilip Kumar Bose and Dipti Kumar Bose in respect of two rooms, one kitchen, one privy and a bath in the back portion of the ground floor of premises No. 12, Kalidas Singhi Lane. The house being old stood in need of repair. The landlords started Municipal facility Case No. 1869 of 1968 in the court of Small Causes Calcutta under Section 575 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 and obtained an order on 13.11.68. The Court directed the tenant to afford all reasonable facilities to the landlord to comply with the requisition of the Corporation for repair of the house....


Apr 05 1990

JamiruddIn Molla Vs. the State and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-05-1990

Reported in: 1991CriLJ356

Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 304, Part II for which he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. Shortly stated the prosecution is that on 30th Asar 1388 B.S. corresponding to 15th July, 1981 in the evening at about 7/7-30 p.m. the accused persons were sitting at a tea-stall belonging to P.W. 1 Kishori Mohan Dey situated by the side of Arindapara Road, Khairamari. At that time a quarrel was going on between Tajer and Khairul. In course of such quarrel the deceased Khalil came to the tea-stall from the field. As soon as Khalil came to the tea-stall, Khairul asked his associates, namely, the other accused persons of this case, to assault Khalil, Khalil started fleeing away, but he was chased by the accused persons and caught hold of. He was brought to the tea-stall and tied up with a rope and then...


Apr 05 1990

Kalimata Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the West Bengal State Ele ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-05-1990

Reported in: (1991)1CALLT396(HC)

B.P. Banerjee, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has challenged the memo dated 30th June 1987 issued by the Senior Accounts Officer Burdwan (O & M) Circle of the West Bengal State Electricity Board, office of the Superintending Engineer, Burdwan whereby the petitioner was directed for re-submission of bank guarantee with enhanced rate of security deposit of Rs. 80,000/- as against the existing security deposit of Rs. 9,650/- and for other relief.2. The fact of this case is that the petitioner No. 1 is a sister concern of Nayak Paper Board Mills, Nayak & Company, Nayak Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Nayak Steel, Nayak Pasteners and being small scale industries which are including the writ petitioner and it is stated that the writ petitioner gets concessional tariff relating to the charges of electricity from the respondents. At the time of giving electric connection to the petitioner concerned, the respondents directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 9,650/- as security deposi...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial