Skip to content


Kolkata Court March 1987 Judgments Home Cases Kolkata 1987 Page 3 of about 24 results (0.004 seconds)

Mar 03 1987 (HC)

Sri Prithwish Kar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1988)ILLJ154Cal

Suhas Chandra Sen, J.1. All the contemners are personally present in Court to-day and they undertake to carry out the order to be passed to-day.2. On 28th June, 1984 an order was passed in the C.R. No. 12328 (W) of 1975 upholding the contentions of the petitioner in the writ petition and making the rule that was issued absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b). Prayers (a) and (b) were as under:-(a) A writ in the nature of mandamus and commanding the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11 not to take into consideration any of the adverse remarks made against the petitioner for the years ending March 31, 1971, 1972 and 1974 (Annexures T, T and 'P') in the matter of successful completion of the period of probation of the petitioner and confirming him in the post of Director and to expunge the said adverse remarks from the service records of the petitioner; (b) A writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11 not to affect the seniority of the pe...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1987 (HC)

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Smt. Smriti Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1987]166ITR814(Cal)

Dipak Kumar Sen, J.1. The facts found or admitted as on record are, inter alia, that one Raghunath Banerjee died on June 4, 1963. After his death, his estate was assessed to estate duty in the hands of the accountable person. The initial assessment was made on February 2, 1968, which was subsequently revised on July 29, 1970, and January 10, 1972.2. During his lifetime, the deceased by a deed dated March 25, 1959, made a gift of five immovable properties which were all let out, viz., premises Nos. 11A, 11/1A, 11B, 11/1B and 10/1, Radha Mohan Saha Lane Calcutta, to his son, Benoy Kumar Banerjee, absolutely and for ever and delivered possession of the same to the latter. It was declared in the said deed that there would be a charge upon the said properties given in the gift of Rs. 50 per month for payment of tax and cost of repairs of premises No. 25, Chorebagan Lane, Calcutta, during the lifetime of the deceased and his wife. It has been found that the deceased, during his lifetime, use...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1987 (HC)

District Magistrate and ors. Vs. Himal Enterprises (Private) Ltd. and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1987)0CALLT241(HC),91CWN985

M.N. Roy, J.1. An order of requisition of the land and buildings with furnitures In R.S. Plot No. 396, Mouza-Chandhaghar. J.L. No. 44, P.S. Barasat 24-Parganas (hereinafter referred to as the said premises) as issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), was challenged in this Court in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the owners of the said premises, who are M/s. Himal Enterprises (Private) Ltd. a Company incorporated under the Sikkim Companies Act and also by one of their Directors Mrs. Sova Shresthe. The writ petitioners are the Respondents in this Appeal and the Civil Order No. 4112(W) 1986, in which the requisition under the said Act were challenged on being disposed of in favour of the petitioners therein, this Appeal was presented by the Respondent State of West Bengal and their authorities, on July, 198G.2. The petitioners in ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1987 (HC)

A.K. Corporation Ltd. Vs. Controller of Imports and Exports

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1989(42)ELT566(Cal)

Bimal Chandra Basak, J.1. In view of the final order which we propose to pass and to which the parties have also not raised any objection, we need not go into the facts in detail. The grievance of the petitioner in the main writ petition, who are the appellants before us, was regarding replenishment licence out of exports made by them. We are concerned with the year 1983-84, that is, 1983 April to 1984 March. Regarding this period in view of relevant import policy which is in paragraph 138, the petitioners were entitled to certain replenishment licence. The endorsement required is under sub-paragraph 14 of Rule 138. The Rule 138 is set out hereinbelow.138(1). REP licences issued to manufacturer-exporters, against their exports of products manufactured by them will be valid, within their overall value for import of any items of raw materials, components, consumables, spares and packing materials, required by them for use in their factories subject to 'Actual User' condition. This specia...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //