Kolkata Court September 1978 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. Mahendra Sing ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-06-1978
Reported in: 1979CriLJ545
Monoj Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. This appeal, at the instance of the State of West Bengal, is directed against the judgment and order of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri, acquitting the accused-respondent Mahendra Singh of the charges under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. The facts relevant for the purpose of disposing of the appeal can be put in a narrow compass.3. On 8-9-68 the accused-respondent was arrested for having been found in possession of a pistol, some bullets and other articles for which a case was registered against him with the Siliguri Police Station by Sri Rameswar Singh. Town Sub-Inspector of Police. The accused was forwarded to Court on 9-9-68 with a forwarding memo. Sub-Inspector S. N. Dutta who took up the investigation examined witnesses, took sanctior from the Deputy Commissioner for proceeding with the case and after completion of investigation submitted charge-sheet against the accused on 31-1-69. The learned Sub-divisional Magistrate took cognisance ...
Anath Bandhu De Vs. Krishna Lal Das and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-04-1978
Reported in: AIR1979Cal168,83CWN125
M.M. Dutt, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff and it arises out of a suit for declaration of title, permanent injunction and for accounts.2. The case of the plaintiff was that one Nayan Chand Nandi installed the deity Sree Sree Gopinath Jew Thakur at 5A, 5B, and 5C, Ratan Babu Road, Cossipur, more than a century ago. His son Mathura Mohan dedicated the Ka schedule properties to the deity. The Kha schedule properties were acquired out of the income of Ka schedule properties. By an Arpannama executed by Mathura Mohan in or about Ashar 1229 B.S., he appointed his widow Rashmoni and his brother's widow Jagadiswari as joint shebaits of the deity. The Arpannama is not, however, traceable. After the death of Jagadiswari, the shebaitship of the deity devolved upon Rashmoni who acted as the sole shebait up to about 1859. By a will dated October 21, 1859, Rashmoni appointed her relation Sristidhar as the shebait of the deity. Sristidhar, by a will which was probated, created a ...
Shambhoo Prosad Bajoria and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-04-1978
Reported in: [1979]120ITR782(Cal)
D.C. Chakravorti, J.1. This appeal is from the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, 13th Court at Alipore, reversing those passed by the Munsif, 2nd Court at Alipore. 2. Facts relevant for the purpose of this appeal are, briefly stated, as follows : 3. The plaintiffs-appellants are the sons of Ramnath Bajoria, since deceased, by his first wife. Their eldest brother. Ram Prosad Bajoria, separated from his father during the latter's lifetime. On the death of Ramnath, dispute arose between the plaintiffs and their step-mother, Smt. Tribeni Debi, over the properties left by their father. Tribeni Debi claimed the entire estate left by Ramnath. For realisation of the tax dues of the said Ramnath, several certificate cases were started against the plaintiffs and some properties of the plaintiffs were illegally attached on different dates. Such attachment was illegal. On these allegations, the plaintiffs brought the instant suit praying for, among others, the following ...
Madura Coats Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-1978
Reported in: 1980(6)ELT582(Cal)
ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. In the instant writ petition the petitioner prays for issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari requiring respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to transmit and certify the records of the proceedings before them to this Court in the matter of determining as to whether nylon and rayon wrap sheets produced by the petitioner company are excisable items and their orders made in such proceedings including the orders dated 24th March, 1975 and 6th February, 1976 so that they are quashed or set aside. The petitioner company also prayed for a writ in the nature of prohibition prohibiting respondents from treating nylon or rayon warp sheets produced by the petitioner company as excisable items and also prohibiting the respondents from demanding, levying or collecting any excise duty in respect of such nylon or rayon warp sheets. The petitioner also prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus prohibiting the respondents from treating nylon or rayon warpsheets arranged or assembled by ...
Kulfatan Bibi and anr. Vs. Afuan Sk. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-1978
Reported in: 1979CriLJ92
R. Bhattacharya, J.1. This re-visional application has been directed against the order of the Sub-divisional Magistrate (Executive) of Rampurhat, passed in a proceeding under S, 145 of the Cr.P.C. 1973. As the learned Magistrate was not able to ascertain which of the parties in the proceedings were in actual possession, he directed that the question as to whether the allegation of the first party-petitioners in the proceedings as to whether they are bargadars or not in the disputed land, be decided by a competent officer under Section 21(3) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act. The petitioners before us are two - (1) Kulfatum Bibi, opposite party No. 2 in the proceedings before the learned Magistrate and (2) Mechher Sk., Petitioner No. 5 before the learned Magistrate.2. It appears that originally an application under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. was filed by the opposite parties Nos. 1 to 4 and petitioner No. 5 before us. Ultimately that proceedings was converted to one under Section 145 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›