Kolkata Court January 1974 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satyanarayan Banerjee and ors. Vs. Charge Officer and A.S.O. Birbhum a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-04-1974
Reported in: AIR1975Cal43
Anil Kumar Sen, J. 1. An order dated February 13, 1970, passed by an Assistant Settlement Officer being also the Charge Officer. Birbhum at Suri in Debottar case No. 28 of 1965 and the consequent notice dated February 18, 1970. are the subject-matter of challenge in this Rule obtained on a writ petition.2. It will be necessary to refer to certain facts leading to the aforesaid order and the notice in order to decide the dispute raised. Late Jadablal Banerjee made an endowment on 19th Pous 1312 B. S. corresponding to early 1900 on a registered Deed of endowment in favour of certain deities. On the endowment so made Jadablal Debottar Trust Estate was created of which the present petitioners are the trustees. Such endowment covered certain properties including certain agricultural and non-agricultural lands. On the enforcement of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 it was found necessary that an adjudication should be held for finding out whether the endowment so made was absolu...
Choutmall Sarogi Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-04-1974
Reported in: 1974CriLJ1134
N.C. Talukdar, J.1. This is an application for bail on behalf of the second-applicant, . Choutmall Sarogi alias Agarwalla, arising out of orders dated the 28th December, 1973 and the 29th December. 1973, passed by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, in Section G. Case No. 851 dated 27-12-1973 under Rules 43 (5) and 36 (6) (i) of the Defence of India Rules, 1971 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The application is with notice to the State and is opposed.2. The facts leading on to the application can be put in a short compass. The accused-applicant is stated to be a Director of M/s. Shree Bajrang Commercial Co. (P.) Ltd. having its office at 13, Brabourne Road. Calcutta and he resides at 11-B, Jatindra Mohan Avenue, Calcutta. On the 27th December 1973 he was arrested by the police on the charge that he, in collusion with three other directors of the company, has been withholding the unloading of salt brought by ships berthed at the Calcutta Port from Sauras...
income-tax Officer, c Ward and ors. Vs. Panama Private Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-03-1974
Reported in: [1974]97ITR210(Cal)
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal, From Panama Private Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer., 'C' Ward, Companies Dist.II, Calcutta. : [1971]82ITR205(Cal) , challenging five notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1968-69. Of the notices, three were dated the 25th of March, 1969, and two dated the 1st of May, 1969. It is the case of the assessee that in respect of the said assessment years the assessee had filed its returns of income along with and supported by the audited profit and loss accounts, depreciation statements, various other statements in detail. The assessee claimed under Rule 5 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, read with Appendix I, Part I, under item III(ii), 10% depreciation and was allowed the same. According to the assessee this was allowed after consideration of the relevant facts as this had already been allowed since the assessment year 1961-62. Thereafter, the assessments were sough...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›