Kolkata Court July 1973 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Burdwan District Bus Association and anr. Vs. the Regional Transport A ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-10-1973
Reported in: AIR1973Cal411,77CWN896
ORDERAnil Kumar Sen, J.1. The subject-matter of challenge in both these two Rules is the same resolution viz., the one dated July 2, 1969, adopted by the Regional Transport Authority, Burdwan extending the five Stage Carriage permits of the Durgapur State Transport Board to Burdwan Court from Keshabgunj-Chatti. The petitioner in one case is the Burdwan District Bus Association and in the other is Sri Ajitava Chakraborty both of whom raised objections against such extension and whose objections had been overruled. The subject matter of challenge being the same and the challenge being based on common grounds these two cases have been heard together and are being disposed of by this judgment. It would be necessary to refer to the facts which are shortly as follows:2. Durgapur State Transport Service a Government undertaking -- applied for five Stage Carriage permits from Durgapur to Burdwan. These applications were considered and disposed of in the year 1967 by the Regional Transport Auth...
Naihati Electric Supply Co. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-1973
Reported in: (1974)IILLJ179Cal
Debiprasad Pal, J.1. Sri Bindeshwari Singh, the respondent No. 4 in this petition was an employ of the petitioner-company. On 22nd November, 1966, he met with an accident and was admitted to the I.S. Hospital, Chinsurah, District Hooghly, He was duly plastered and discharged from the hospital, Subsequently he was placed under the treatment of Dr. K.L. Dutta, the then Medical Officer of the company. Dr. Dutta referred him to Dr. G.K. Chowdhury, who is a specialist. The respondent No. 4 filed a claim case before the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Court, Calcutta under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred as to the Compensation Act). By a judgment dated 7th May, 1969, the Additional Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Court. Calcutta in the claim case No. 274 of 1968 held that the respondent No. 4 had suffered permanent partial disablement to the extent of 45% and that his capacity to work had been impaired to that extent and that should be the percentage of l...
Kartik Chandra Banerjee Vs. Sm. Manjurani Banerjee and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-1973
Reported in: AIR1973Cal545,78CWN36
A.K. Sinha, J. 1. This is husband's appeal against dismissal of his application for declaration of his marriage with respondent No. 1, the wife, as nullity and for consequential reliefs, preferred in this Court briefly, in the following circumstances : 2. Shortly put, the petitioner's case is that on the negotiations of the appellant's uncle and other relations and the father of the first respondent, marriage between him and the first respondent was solemnised on 4th June, 1964 after performing Hindu rites of 'Sampradan and Kusandika' at the residence of the first respondent. But after solemnisation of marriage when the first respondent was brought to the residence of the appellant on 5th June, 1964 at about 7.15 p. m. she was found not to have been behaving like a normal person at night. As according to the custom that was a night technically called 'Kal Ratri' when the husband and wife could not meet, she had to remain in a separate room. There she insisted on closing all windows and...
Anil Baran Deoty and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-1973
Reported in: AIR1974Cal205,77CWN826
ORDERAnil Kumar Sen, J.1. In this Writ petition the sixteen petitioners whose properties were covered by an Improvement Scheme framed and published on November 4, 1965, by respondent No. 3 are praying for a mandate upon the said respondent to publish the resolution dated November 28, 1968, whereby the said respondent abandoned the scheme.2. The respondent No. 3, the Trustees for the improvement of Howrah prepared a General Improvement Scheme under Section 33 (2) of the Howrah Improvement Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act)covering various areas in the erstwhile Ward No. 6 of the Howrah Municipality. It is not in dispute that the properties of the present petitioners are covered by the said scheme. The scheme so prepared was duly published in the Official Gazette on November 4. 1965 under Section 45 (2) of the said Act. Public notices under Section 45 (1) were also issued so also personal notices under Section 47. It is not in dispute that various objections were raised ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›