Kolkata Court October 1972 Judgments
Talakchand Kanji Vora Vs. Keshavlal Dullabajji Sheth
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-05-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Cal279,78CWN744
ORDERHazra, J.1. This is a petition by one partner Talakchand Kanji Vora (hereinafter referred to as 'Kanji Vora') against another partner Keshavlal DulIabhji Sheth (hereinafter referred to as 'Sheth') for injunction and for appointment of receiver, Kanji Vora and Sheth entered into an agreement to carry on business in co-partnership under the name and style of 'The Western Trading Corporation' or 'Western Trading Corporation' (hereinafter referred to as the said 'firm'). The business carried on by the firm was in sundry goods, inter alia, as importers at 55, Canning Street. Calcutta. The partnership deed is annexure 'A' to the present petition,2. On March 22, 1954, the partnership agreement was modified by a Deed. Vora and Sheth carried on the said business in co-partnership and on March 17. 1971 Vora gave a written notice to Sheth under Section 43 of the Indian Partnership Act dissolving the firm with effect from April 16, 1971.3. This suit was filed on March 22, 1972, that is after ...
Tag this Judgment!Pasupati Roy Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-03-1972
Reported in: AIR1974Cal99,77CWN157
B.C. Mitra, J.1. The subject-matter of challenge in the writ petition, out of which this appeal arises, is the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Fisheries (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1965, hereafter referred to as the Act The appellant is the owner of a Fishery in the District of 24-Par-ganas, and claims to have spent Rs. 15,000/-in repairing embankment and in clearing weeds. He also claims to have spent a large sum of money to make the Fishery fit for pisciculture and also claims to have spent other sums for maintenance of the Fishery.2. On November 11, 1966, he received a Notice that the Fishery had been requisitioned under Section 4 of the Act, directing him to deliver possession of the Fishery to a representative of the Land Acquisition Department on November 13, 1966. Symbolic possession of the Fishery was taken on that date. Thereupon the appellant obtained a rule nisi on a writ petition. This rule was discharged by a judgment and order dated April 17, 1972 which ...
Tag this Judgment!Mira Bose Vs. Santosh Kumar Bose
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-03-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Cal483,77CWN376
A.C. Gupta, J. 1. The propriety of an Order refusing to adjourn a proceeding for judicial separation under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act is challenged by the wife by preferring an appeal from the said order and also by filing a revisional application in the alternative in case it was found that the appeal was not maintainable. The petition under Section 10 was made by the wife and it was she who had asked for adjournment of her suit arising on that petition. The facts in the background leading to the prayer for adjournment which was rejected are as follows:-- Appellant Mira Bose was married to the respondent Santosh Kumar Bose on July 7, 1965. Two male children were born of this marriage on February 15, 1967 and April 11, 1968 respectively. On November 22, 1968 she left the matrimonial home leaving the children behind; according to the husband she left of her own accord, her case is that she was compelled to leave. On May 3, 1969 she filed the petition under section 10 of the Hi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›