Kolkata Court November 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In Re: Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Private Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-30-1966
Reported in: [1967]37CompCas516(Cal),71CWN340
A.N. Ray, J.1. This is an application for an order that the alteration of the memorandum of association of the company, to wit, Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Private Limited, sought to be effected by the special resolution set out in paragraph 6 of the petition and passed at the general meeting of the company held on 2nd November, 1965, be confirmed.2. The petitioner, Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Private, Limited was incorporated on 30th March, 1951, under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, as a public limited company. The company became a private limited company on and from 27th March, 1956, and the name of the company was changed to Mackinnon Mackenzie and Company Private Limited as from 16th June, 1961. The registered office of the company is situate at 16, Strand Road, Calcutta.3. The capital of the company was Rs. 4 crores divided into one lakh 6 per cent, cumulative taxable preference shares of Rs. 100 each and three lakhs ordinary shares of Rs. 100 each. The issued and s...
Babulal Madhavji Varma Vs. New Standard Coal Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-24-1966
Reported in: [1967]37CompCas446(Cal),71CWN333
B.C. Mitra, J. 1. This is an application for rectification of the register of members of New Standard Coal Company Private Limited (hereafter referred to as the company) by entering on the register the petitioner's name as a member of the company as the holder of 74 shares and for an order deleting the names of the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 as the holders thereof. 2. On October 3, 1963, an order was made on an application under Sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956, appointing respondent No. 2 as the special officer of the company with powers to take possession of the colliery belonging to the company and also of the books of account and assets of the company. The board of directors of the company was superseded and its powers were vested in the special officer. Pursuantto this order, respondent No. 2 has taken possession of the company's assets and books and is exercising the powers of the board. 3. On or about January 15, 1964, respondents Nos. 3 and 4 sold and transfer...
Sovachand Mulchand Vs. the Collector of Central Excise and Land Custom ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-23-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Cal174,71CWN700
Sankak Prasad Mitra, J. 1. This is an appeal from the Judgment and Order ifSinha J. (as he then was) dated the 25th November, 1953. The facts briefly are thatprior to the 1st of June, 1951, the export of Aluminium to Pakistan was permissible under an Open General licence. There was no prohibitior on such exports. BY a Notification dated the 1st June. 1951, the Government of India, imposed a prohibition. M/s. Sovachand Mulchand the appellant before us applied on the 10th July, 1951 to the Land Customs Authorities at Sealdah for a permit to export a certain quantity of aluminium warp to Mymonsingh in Eastern Pakistan. The Government of India on July 12, 1951, rejected the application: but since the notification of the 1st June, 1951 had not been communicated to Sealdah. a wagon was allotted to the petitioner on the 13th July, 1951 for despatch of goods on the 14th. As the goods were not tendered, the Railways, we were told, cancelled the allotment. On the 11th July, 1951, the notificatio...
Kesoram Rayon Workmen's Union Vs. Registrar of Trade Unions and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-22-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Cal507,(1968)ILLJ335Cal
D. Basu, J. 1. The Petitioner Kesoram Rayon Workmen's Union, a Trade Union of the workmen of Respondent No. 4 (Kesorani Industries & Cotton Mills Ltd.) has brought this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution on the following allegations:2. The Petitioner was registered as a Trade Union on 7-9-1959. In 1964, it organised a strike to compel Respondent No 4 to accede to the demands of its members; on 16-3-1964 the dispute was referred by the State Government (Respondent No. 2) to the First Industrial Tribunal and it was followed by an Award of the Tribunal, dated 4-6-1964, in terms thereof. Further disputes having arisen thereafter, various tripartite agreements were entered into by Respondent No. 4 at the instance of the Petitioner As a result of these activities of the Petitionr. Respondent No. 4 sought to set up a rival Trade Union of its employees and succeeded in setting up Respondent No. 3. the Kesoram Rayon Sramik Union, consisting of not more than 10 per cent of its employ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›