Kolkata Court July 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Behari Lal Mitter Vs. Saral Kumar Ghose
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-08-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal163
Bose, C.J. 1. This is an appeal from an order of A.N. Ray, J., dated the 6th May, 1964 directing stay of sale of a certain property attached in execution of a decree upon deposit of a certain amount by the judgment-debtor with the Sheriff of Calcutta but ordering continuance of the attachment levied notwithstanding such deposit.2. The appellant was appointed as executor to the Estate of one Sannyasi Charan Ghose. On the 19th August 1926 Sannyasi Charan Ghose died and thereafter the appellant obtained probate of the will of the said Sannyasi Charan Ghose from the District Court at Alipur.3. In 1928 Sidheswar Ghose, the son of Sannyasi Charan Ghose, instituted a suit in this Courtfor construction of the Will of Sannyasi CharanGhose, for possession of premises No. 197A Muktaram Babu Street, for administration of the Estateand for other reliefs mentioned in the plaint.After various proceedings a decree was passed infavour of the plaintiff on the 10th August 1948against the Estate of the sa...
M.L. Bose and Co. Private Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-07-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal454,(1968)ILLJ638Cal
D. Basu, J.1. An industrial dispute arising out of the dismissal of some workmen of the Appellant Company was referred by the State Government to the Third Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal.2. The Industrial Tribunal made its award on the 4th of December, 1958, holding that the dismissed workmen should be reinstated and that they should be paid by way of compensation 1/3 of the emoluments for the period between the dates of their dismissal and the dates of their re-instatement An appeal to the Supreme Court by special leave against this award failed. Subsequently, 44 of the workmen, who got the award in their favour filed applications before the State Government for recovery of the benefits due to them in terms of the award, as just stated, and, under Sub-section (2) of Section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the State Government specified the second Labour Court (Respondent No. 2) as the Labour Court authorised to compute, in terms of m...
Smt. Bagsu Devi Bafna Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-06-1964
Reported in: AIR1966Cal73,69CWN66,[1967]63ITR333(Cal)
B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner feels aggrieved by an order of revision of assessment of her income, made under Section 33-B of the Income-tax Act, 1922, by the respondent Commissioner of Income-tax, for the assessment years 1953-54 to 1961-62.2. The circumstances under which the revision of assessment was made are briefly as hereinafter stated. The assessee filed voluntary returns of income for the assessment years 1953-54 to 1959-60 and also for the year 1960-61, all in the year 1961. One Mr. H. Upadhaya, who was at the material time the Income Tax Officer, B-Ward, 24 Parganas, assessed the petitioner for the assessment year 1953-54 to a total income of Rs. 5,000 in the manner hereinafter quoted: 'Seen return. In response to notice under Section 23 (2) authorised representative Shri C.M. Chopra appears and the case is discussed. Evidences produced are also examined. Assessee was married about 30 years ago and received certain gifts and presents in cash, which is customary. With th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›