Kolkata Court April 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National and Grindlays Bank Ltd. Vs. Tikam Chand Daga and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-16-1964
Reported in: AIR1964Cal358
U.C. Law, J.1. The plaintiff has brought this action for recovery of sum of Rs. 1,80,414/- against the defendants as guarantors. The facts out of which this action arises shortly as follows:2. A company known as the Central Jute Co., Ltd. having its registered office at Narayanganj in East Pakistan (to be called hereafter as the Company) maintained an overdraft account with the plaintiff then carrying on business of banking in the name and style of National Bank of India Ltd., Narayanganj Branch. Subsequently, the name of the plaintiff bank was first changed to National Overseas and Grindlays Bank Ltd, with effect from 1st January, 1958 and later on the name was again changed to National and Grindlays Bank Ltd., with effect from 1st January, 1959.3. By the Deed of Hypothecation dated 8th November, 1954, the Company hypothecated in favour of the plaintiff the stocks of jute described in the Hypothecation Deed to secure a loan to granted by the plaintiff up to a limit of Rupees 10 lakhs ...
Ganesh Chandra Saha Vs. Jiw Raj Somani
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-10-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal32,1965CriLJ24,68CWN1081
ORDERR.N. Dutt, J. 1. This revisional application is directed against an order of conviction and sentence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The complainant's case was as follows: He was a student of Class VII of Samshi Secondary School in the district of Malda. The petitioner was the Head Master of the School. On August 12, 1961, during school hours one other student named Hiran lost one of his books while in the School. The complainant was found to have stolen that book. The petitioner thereupon treat him with a cane and also gave him fists and blow. 3. The petitioner was on this allegation tried tinder Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty. The learned Magistrate convicted the petitioner under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 15/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three days. 4. Mr. Chatterjee, who appears for the petitioner, does not question the finding of fact that 'the petitioner beat the com...
Joti Majumdar and anr. Vs. Girija Bhusan Roy and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-07-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal11,68CWN1071
Banerjee, J.1. On December 21st, 1957, the two appellants-petitioners filed a suit, being Title Suit No. 279 of 1957, in the court of the Subordinate Judge at Berhampore, as paupers. They won in the suit. The defendants-respondents appealed against the decree of the trial court before the court of the Additional District Judge at Berhampore. The lower Appellate Court decreed the appeal and reversed the decree of the trial court. The appellate decree bears the date December 13, 1963.2. On February 24, 1964 the petitioners filed memorandum of second appeal in the office of this court, against the Appellate decree, and by a separate application prayed for leave to appeal as paupers. The Stamp Reporter of this court returned the memorandum of appeal to the learned Advocate, who filed the appeal, on February 24, 1964; with the following report:'In time upto 5-2-64 so far as the application is concerned. It is, therefore, out of time on 24-2-64, the date of presentation, by 19 days. If the n...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›