Kolkata Court January 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sm. Gouribala Jana Vs. Nityananda Jana
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-09-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal190,1965CriLJ425,68CWN1178
ORDERAmaresh Roy, J. 1. This is a Reference made by the learned Sessions Judge of Midnapore under Section 438 Cr. P. C. recommending that the order passed by the learned Magistrate dismissing an application made before him by a wife under Section 488 Cr. P. C. for maintenance allowance should be set aside and a proper order made on that application. The wife's application was made in the court of the learned Magistrate on 23rd of August, 1961 alleging therein that the petitioner had been married to the opposite party about 12 years ago and had borne three children to him. Unfortunately two of those children, that is, the eldest and also the youngest who were the two sons, have died and only a daughter now aged about eight or nine years is now alive. During her stay in the husband's place the wife was taken ill of certain diseases. During that time also the husband had already brought a mistress and latterly the husband has married a second wife. Due to her illness the petitioner was tr...
Mangala Prosad Vs. V.J. Manerikar and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-03-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Cal507,1965CriLJ477,68CWN383
Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner carries on business under the trade name of Hard Sales Agency, at No. 34, Armenian Street, Calcutta. On August 3, 1962, the office and godown of the petitioner was searched by the police and certain tins of dyes, all manufactured in foreign countries, and certain other articles were seized. On the same date the petitioner was arrested by the police, on a charge of retaining stolen properties, and was prosecuted before the Additional Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta. After a long and protracted enquiry by the police, the petitioner was discharged on September 11, 1962. While the police investigation was going on, a Deputy Superintendent of Land Customs applied before the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate, under Section 180 of the Sea Customs Act, praying that the seized goods be delivered to the Customs Department. The Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate granted the prayer and the Customs Department took possession of the seized goods from the police...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›