Kolkata Court March 1954 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Makhanlal Chakravarty Vs. S.K. Chatterjee and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Cal72,58CWN617
ORDERSinha, J.1. The facts in this case are as follows. There is a School at Kanchrapara, in the 24-par-ganas, known as the Kancharapara Boys' High School. It was established in 1949, and provides educational facilities for children of refugee families. I am told that the present roll-strength is well over seven hundred. It was commenced in hogla sheds, but now owns a pucca structure, a substantial part of the cost of which was borne by the Government of West Bengal in its Refugee Relief and Rehabilitation department. The School was being administered by a managing committee of which the petitioner was the Secretary. This managing committee was constituted on 10-4-1949. The school received provisional recognition from the University of Calcutta for two years from 1-1-1949 to 31-12-1950, with permission to present candidates at the Matriculation examination in 1950 and 1951. On or about 10-3-1951, the Syndicate of the Calcutta University passed a resolution, granting a conditional recog...
Radha Gobinda Paul, Secretary, Dist. Transport Organization, Midnapore ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Cal59,58CWN553
ORDERSinha, J. 1. The petitioner Radha Govinda Paul has made this application on his own behalf as well as in his capacity as the Secretary of an association known as 'The District Transport Organization, Midnapore.' The petitioner is himself the owner of several Buses plying in the district of Midnapore and the association consists of various owners of Buses plying or intended to ply in that district. The Association is not an incorporated one and the question will arise as to whether the petitioner can properly represent it and whether I can take any notice of this application as having been made on behalf of the association. The petition shows that the association has been in existence for more than 10 years.2. It appears that since December 1951, the fares that were charged by the members of the association including the petitioner had the concurrence of the Regional Transport Authority and was according to a schedule set out in paragraph 3 of the petition. In August 1952, however,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›