Kolkata Court June 1952 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sm. Anjali Roy Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-05-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Cal825,56CWN801
Chakravartti, Ag. C.J.1. The appellant, who is a girl-student, applied to the Hooghly Mohsin College for admission in the 3rd Year class with Honours in Economics and her application being finally refused, she moved this Court for the issue of certain writs in order to the enforcement of what she claimed to be her fundamental right of being considered for admission to the College. Her case is that the refusal of her application was based solely on the ground of her sex and thus a contravention of Article 15(1) of the Constitution and that it was also mala fide. The way in which she has been dealt with by the Education Department is that while being refused admission to the Mohsin College, she, like other eligible girl-students, has been offered facilities for attending the Honours classes in that institution, provided she got herself admitted in (the 'Women's College which was recently established in the locality and which, at present, gives instruction only in the Pass courses. Bose, ...
The Official Trustee of West Bengal Vs. Monmothonath Sadhukhan
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-05-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal499
P.B. Mukharji, J.1. In this application the Official Trustee of West Bengal asks for an enquiry and investigation regarding resistance and obstruction offered by (1) Abdul Sukkur Moham-mad Osman Khan, (2) Akhtar Hossain Khan and (3) Abdul Jalil when the applicant wanted the Sheriff to execute his decree for possession of premises No. 17, 17/1 and 17/1/1 Kashi Nath Mallick Lane,. Calcutta. The application is made under Order 21, Rule 97, C. P. C. The respondents have appeared and used their affidavits in opposition to this application.2. Before discussing the points of opposition, it will be necessary to state briefly the material and relevant facts.3. This suit was instituted by the Official Trustee on 15-3-1946 against the defendant for the recovery of possession of the said premises which had been let out to the defendant whose tenancy was later determined by notice to quit. The defendant contested that suit. But after some proceedings a decree for ejectment was made on 18-12-1946 in...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›