Kolkata Court February 1952 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kartick Chandra and ors. Vs. the Corporation of Calcutta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-11-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal87
Chakravartti, J. 1. These are two Rules one taken out by Dr. Kartick Chandra Bose who is admittedly the owner of premises No. 45 Amherst Street, and the other taken out by seven other persons who claim to be occupiers of the same premises. The Rules are directed against an order, dated the 29th of June, 1951, passed by the Third Municipal Magistrate of Calcutta, whereby the learned Magistrate directed certain structures to be demolished. 2. It appears that on the 22nd of March, 1949, the Corporation received a letter from one D. K. Dutt who is the owner of premises Nos. 128 and 130 Keshab Sen Street, Calcutta, and by that letter the said D. K. Dutt complained that certain unauthorised structures had been put up at 45, Amherst Street with the result that the access of light and air to the adjacent premises owned by him had been materially affected. Prior to the receipt of this letter, however, the unauthorised structures had already received the attention of the inspecting staff of the ...
Sm. Chitra Devi and ors. Vs. Badri Bisal Bhakat and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-11-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal125
ORDERHarries, C.J.1. This is a petition for revision of anorder of an appellate court upholding an order ofa learned Munsif made under Section 151 of the Codeof Civil Procedure.2. The decree-holder respondent put up a property for sale in execution of a decree which he held against a judgment-debtor. That property was purchased by the petitioner and the sale was duly confirmed by the court. Later an application was made by the respondent under Section 151 asking that this sale be set aside on the ground that by a mistake the decree holder had sold his own property in execution of the decree. The courts held that such was the case and have set aside the sale.3. A point was taken that the proceedings were misconceived and could not take place under Section 151. That I think would be a good objection. But it is pointed out by the court that these proceedings are in the nature of a review of an order made in execution. However it is unnecessary to pursue this point because I am satisfied t...
Bijoy Ranjan Vs. B.C. Das Gupta, President, Governing Body, State Medi ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-04-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal289
ORDERBose, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for an appropriate writ directing the opposite parties to withdraw or revoke the order of cancellation of the Intermediate Licentiateship Medical examination held at the Burdwan centre in June 1051 and to publish the results of the said examination. The petitioner is a Matriculate of the University of Calcutta. In 1947 he got himself admitted into the Chittagong Medical School in Eastern Pakistan for the purpose of obtaining a L.M.F. Diploma. In 1948 the petitioner passed the Primary examination. In February 1950 owing to communal disturbances in Eastern Pakistan the petitioner and his family came over to India as refugees. After coming to India, the petitioner continued his medical studies and got himself admitted in the Burdwan Ronaldshay Medical School, which is an institution run by the State Medical Faculty of West Bengal. In November 1960 the petitioner appeared in the Intermediate examination conducted...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›