Kolkata Court September 1932 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Francis Duke Cobridge Sumner, Offg. Deputy Secretary, Port Commissione ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-30-1932
Reported in: AIR1933Cal348
Mukerji, J.1. These two Rules are directed against certain orders which have been passed by the Subdivisional Magistrate of Howrah under Section 144, Criminal P. C., in connexion with the starting of a haut in the town of Howrah.2. The facts shortly put are the following: The employers of the opposite party in these Rules, who, for the sake of brevity, will be called the Chamarias, are the owners of a haut which goes by the name of Mangla haut and which has been in existence for about ten years and holds its sittings on Tuesdays at a site on the Chandmari Road, close to the Buckland Bridge. Kanhaia Lal Memani and Lun Karan Das Memani, the petitioners in Revision Case No. 908 are partners of a firm styled Jewan Ram Ganga Ram and Co. This firm, presumably with the object of starting another haut in the locality, obtained a transfer of a lease of a plot of about 14 bighas of land which was held under the Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta by one Srilal Chamaria. This plot of land abut...
Jogendra Mohan Guha Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-1932
Reported in: AIR1933Cal516
Patterson, J,1. The main facts of the case out of which this appeal arises are not disputed and are briefly as follows: The appellant, Jogendramohan Guha, was arrested in Sukea Street on 16th March 1932, in consequence of certain information which had been received by the police. Later in the day, he was taken to the house of his cousin, Babu. Lalitmohan Guha, at No. 2, Kalu Ghosh Lane, where he had been living for some time back and working as private tutor to certain members of the family in return for his board and lodging. He had been sharing a room with Lalit Babu's son, Haripada, and when the police were about to search this room, the appellant showed them a locked steel trunk, and told them that what they wanted was in that trunk. The key of the trunk was produced from a drawer under the direction of the appellant, and on the trunk being open a loaded revolver was found therein, concealed among some books and clothes belonging to the appellant. A note book (which is said to cont...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›