Kolkata Court March 1925 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumar Arun Chandra Sinha Bahadur and ors. Vs. Hemanta Kumar Banerjee a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-1925
Reported in: 98Ind.Cas.663
Chakravarti, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit under Section 105 of the Bengal Tenancy Act, under which the present appellation filed an application for additional rent for an additional area in a tenure. The record shows that the lands of three villages were within this putni. The landlord's Case was that the putnidars were in possession of more lands than they look settlement of. The tenure was created by a deed, dated 1841. The defendant's case was that they were in possession of the putni as recorded in the Record of Rights and that the putni patta shows that, the putni comprised the land of Lot Sabek Khotar. The plaintiffs based their case on the ground that there were some other Villages which were in the possession of the defendants. The plaintiffs even in this proceeding did not state that Lot Sabek Khotar really included only one mouza of Sabek Khotar and not more. Further than this the plaintiffs at the trial stated that they did not wish to challenge the Record of Rights...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›