Kolkata Court October 1908 Judgments
Jamini Mullick Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-01-1908
Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal174
Mitra, J.1. There are four sets of petitioners before us. The first petition has been presented on behalf of Jamini Mullick and five others, the second on behalf of Akhil Chandra Sarkar and nine others, the third on behalf of Santosh Chandra Dass and Surendra Nath Mukerjee and the fourth on behalf of Abinash Chandra Mitter. The applications purport to be under Section 497, read with Section 498, of the Criminal Procedure Code.2. A preliminary inquiry is now going on in the Court of the Joint Magistrate at Midnapore. The proceedings against most of the petitioners commenced practically on the 28th August 1908, but Santosh and Surendra had been arrested in July. All, the petitioners have since then been in custody. Santosh and Surendra had been in custody from July. The offences with which they have been charged are non-bailable and undoubtedly of a very serious nature.3. On the 7th September, the case came on before the Joint Magistrate, and there was a remand. The preliminary enquiry w...
Tag this Judgment!Jamini Mullick and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-01-1908
Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.910
Mitra, J.1. There are four sets of petitioners before us. The first petition has been presented on behalf of Jamini Mullick and five others, the second on behalf of Akhil Chandra Sarkar and nine others, the third on behalf of Santosh Chandra Dass and Surendra Nath Mukerjee and the fourth on behalf of Abinash Chandra Mitter. The applications purport to be under Section 497, read with Section 498. of the Criminal Procedure Code,2. A preliminary inquiry is now going on in the Court of the Joint Magistrate at Midnapore. The proceedings against most of the petitioners commenced practically on the 28th August 1908, but Santosh and Surendra had been arrested in July. All the petitioners have since then been in custody. Santosh and Surendra had been in custody from July. The offences with which they have been charged are non-bailable and undoubtedly of a very serious nature.3. On the 7th September, the case came on before the Joint Magistrate, and there was a remand. The preliminary enquiry wa...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›