Skip to content

Kolkata Court January 1903 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 26 1903

In Re: Purna Chandra Dutt

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-26-1903

Reported in: (1904)ILR31Cal44

Francis W. Maclean, C.J.1. This is a Rule directed to be issued by this Court, calling upon Babu Purna Chandra Dutt, a pleader of some twenty years' standing in the Calcutta Court of Small Causes, to show cause why he should not be suspended or dismissed for grossly improper conduct in the discharge of his professional duties.2. The facts are these, and they lie in a nutshell. The opposite party acted as pleader on behalf of the plaintiffs in a certain suit, and in that suit they recovered a sum of Rs. 1,657. They gave this gentleman a power-of-attorney to draw out the money. He drew the money out of Court on the 18th of June; and it is quite clear that he applied that money to his own purpose. On the 31st of July, the clients applied for the money, and in reply to that demand he wrote a letter of that date, in which he says: 'With reference to the decretal amount in suit No. 4372 of 1903 decreed on 30th April 1902, the sum of Rs. 1,657-6 has been drawn by me on the 18th June 1902. I w...


Jan 19 1903

Jogini Mohan Chatterji Vs. Bhoot Nath Ghosal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-19-1903

Reported in: (1904)ILR31Cal146

Francis W. Maclean, C.J.1. This is a very short matter. The suit is one to enforce a mortgage. The defendant who was a young man at the date lie gave it, set up various defences of fraud and so forth, all of which have been found against him. The only point for our decision is this. In the Schedule (A) to the mortgage deed, item (I) is described as.' The undivided one cottah four chittacks of land more or less, comprising premises No. 251-2, Upper, Circular Road, Holding 49, Subdivision XIV, Division II, Mouzah Manicktollah, Thanah Manicktollah, Sub-Registry Sealdah,' and so forth; and the earlier part of the deed contains this statement: 'Out of the properties' mentioned in Schedule (A) below the property mentioned in item (I) of the said schedule is the land purchased with my self-acquired money.' This mortgage which also' comprised certain property in Calcutta was registered in the Sealdah Registry, which would be quite right, assuming that the mortgage comprised any property in the...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial