Kolkata Court October 1899 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
ishan Chandra Kalla and anr. Vs. Dina Nath Badhak
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-03-1899
Reported in: (1900)ILR27Cal174
Sale and Stanley, JJ.1. We think that this rule must be made absolute, and our reason for so thinking is that there is no sufficient finding that the dispossession complained of was attended by criminal force such as is contemplated by Section 522, Code of Criminal Procedure. According to the ruling in Ram Chandra Boral v. Jityandria (1897) I.L.R., 25 Cal., 434, in order to support an order under Section 522 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, there must be a finding that the dispossession was by the use of criminal force as defined in Section 350 of the Indian Penal Code. There has been no such finding here, and the result is that the order made under Section 522 of the Code of Criminal Procedure musk be set aside and the rule made absolute....
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›