Kolkata Court December 1892 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rohimuddi and anr. Vs. the Queen-empress, on the Prosecution of Asiram ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-01-1892
Reported in: (1893)ILR20Cal353
1. The only ground upon which is was contended that the conviction and sentence should be set aside was that the judgment of the Sessions Judge was not a judgment in accordance with law, not being in conformity with the provisions of Section 367 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and Mr. Gasper contended on the authority of the cases of Kamruddin Dei v. Sonatun Mandal I.L.R. 11 Cal. 449 and In the matter of the petition of Ram Das Maghi I.L.R. 13 Cal. 110, that he was entitled to have the conviction and sentence set aside and the case remanded to the Sessions Judge for a rehearing of the appeal.2. The judgment of the High Court (Prinsep and Ghose, JJ.) was as follows:- In this case we have been required on revision to consider whether the judgment of the Sessions Judge of Rungpur on appeal is a judgment within the terms of Section 367 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or whether it is not so defective in substance as to demand a retrial of that appeal. The judgment runs as follows:(Th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›