Kerala Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pareekutty Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE16H DAY OF MAY201426TH VAISAKHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 3095 of 2014 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 13/2014 OF VANDIPERIYAR EXCISE RANGE OFFICE , IDUKKI ..... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. PAREEKUTTY,AGED43YEARS, S/O.HAMEEDKUTTY MUHAMMED, PONTHANAL HOUSE, NADAKKAL DESOM, ERATTUPETTA(VIA), MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.2. SAKEER HUSSAIN, S/O.SALIM, AGED45YEARS, MANNARATHU HOUSE, NADAKKAL DESOM, ERATTUPETTA(VIA),MEENACHIL, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1605-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K. Ramakrishnan, J.======...
Benoy Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE16H DAY OF MAY201426TH VAISAKHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 3062 of 2014 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 2010/2013 OF GURUVAYOOR POLICE STATION , THRISSUR ... PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------------- BENOY,AGED31YEARS, S/O.PARAMESWARAN, PUTHUMANASSERRY HOUSE, BRAHMAKULAM DESOM, THAICKAD VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SMT.MEREENA JOSEPH SMT.P.M.FAREETHA BANU RESPONDENT: ---------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, ON BEHALF OF THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GURUVAYOOR POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.RARSHEED THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1605-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.--------------------------------------- B.A.No.3062 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of ...
M/S.Eddy Current Controls (India) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Ass ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE16H DAY OF MAY201426TH VAISAKHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12448 of 2014 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- M/S.EDDY CURRENT CONTROLS (INDIA) LTD. EDDYPURAM, POTTA CHALAKUDY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.D.JOSE. BY ADVS.SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.P.RAHUL RESPONDENTS : ----------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, CHALAKUDY-680307.2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR-680001.3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, IRINJALAKUDA-680121. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANEER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1605-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BP WP(C).No. 12448 of 2014 (E) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE1T RESPONDENT AY- 2007-08 (CST) DATED122.2014. P2:...
Abdul Jaleel, S/O.Mammad Koya Vs. Station House Officer, City Traffic ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE16H DAY OF MAY2014 26TH VAISAKHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 5918 of 2013 (B) --------------------------------------- [CRL.R.P. NO.95 OF2012ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF SESSIONS, KOZHIKODE DIVISION] ............. PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------------- ABDUL JALEEL, S/O.MAMMED KOYA, THIRUVOTH HOUSE, IRINGALLOOR.P.O, KOZHIKODE-14. BY SRI.ABDUL JALEEL, (PARTY-IN-PERSON). RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CITY TRAFFIC POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE.2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. S. HYMA. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0404-2014, THE COURT ON1605-2014 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Prv. "CR" K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.................................................. Crl.M.C.No.5918 of 2013...
M.K.Aboobacker Vs. Kerala State Environmental Assessment Authority
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY,THE16H DAY OF MAY201426TH VAISAKHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12495 of 2014 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. M.K.ABOOBACKER S/O.UMMER KOYA, AGED65YEARS, MUJEEB MANZIL, KOLLAI P.O. PANNIYAMKARA VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK KLOZHIKODE DISTRICT.2. HASSIM, S/O.AHAMMED KUNJU, AGED59YEARS DIAMOND HOUSE, GOLF LINK ROAD MALAPPARAMBU P.O., CHEVAYOOR VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S) : ---------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 024 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR WAYANAD DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, WAYANAD, PIN-670 721.3. THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, WAYANAD CIVIL STATION, WAYANAD, PIN-670 721. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MANOJ P. KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1605-2014...
Lawrence Vs. the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN FRIDAY,THE16H DAY OF MAY201426TH VAISAKHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 3312 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 244/2014 OF ARUVIKKARA POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT ---------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED A1 & A2: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. LAWRENCE, S/O.ANTONY,AGED40YEARS, SNEHA HOUSE, SANTHI NAGAR, VALIYARAMURI, VELLANAD VILLAGE.2. AUGUSTINE, S/O.PONNAYYAN, AGED39YEARS, AYANIKKADU VEEDU, VEMBANNOOR, VEMBANNOOR WARD, ARUVIKKARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.PIN-682 031. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.N.SURESH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1605-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J......................................
Vocational Higher Secondary Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY,THE16H DAY OF MAY201426TH VAISAKHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12507 of 2014 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY NON-VOCATIONAL LECTURERS' ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SHAJI PARIPPILLY,DEVIKA, VELLAKULANGARA, MANAKKALA P.O, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. PIN-691 551.2. SMT. SHEELA K.BABY, W/O.BITTU IYPE,AGED32YEARS, WORING AS NON-VOCATIONAL TEACHER IN PHYSICS, VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KALLISSERI CHENGANNUR AND RESIDING AT KINARUVILAYIL BLESSIVILLA, KAIPATTOOR P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.3. SMT. SAVITHA. V, W/O.RAJESH., V.C,AGED32YEARS, WORKING AS NON-VOCATIONAL TEACHER IN MATHEMATICS, T.T.T.M VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VADASSERIKKARA AND RESIDING AT LEKSHM NIVAS, POOVATTOOR WEST, MAVADI P.O, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM -691 507.4. SMT. BINDU THANKAM VARGHESE,W/O.SHIBU EAPEN,AGED39YEARS, WORK...
J. Sasikumar Vs. Rekha Radhakrishnan
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: May-12-2014
A. Radha : Member Appellant is the opposite party before the Forum Below, Thrissur in C.C.No.178/11 wherein the Forum Below allowed the complaint and directed the opposite party to return Rs.1,30,000/-with interest @ 18% p.a and cost of Rs.2,500/-. 2. The complaint is with regard to the failure in completion of the construction work of complainants house. An amount of Rs.2,50,000/- was paid to the opposite parties and the finished work was only for Rs.76,415/- as per the report of the expert appointed by the Forum Below. In this case the opposite party was exparte and the Forum Below proceeded with the case and allowed the complaint. 3. When this appeal came up for hearing, it is submitted by the counsel for the appellant/opposite party that though the notice was served on the opposite party the case entrusted to the Advocate could not defend the case. The Forum Below based on the pleadings in the complaint and even in the absence of evidence in support of the pleadings allowed the com...
Max Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (Formerly Known as âandeuro;andoelig;max ...
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: May-12-2014
A. Radha, Member This appeal is preferred by opposite party against the order in C.C.No.146/12 on the file of CDRF, Pathanamthitta. The Forum below directed to pay the remaining2/3 of thematurity amount against the complainants policy with interest @ 12% p.a along with cost of Rs.5,000/-. Further direction is to pay Rs.15,000/- as compensation to the complainant by the 2nd opposite party. 2. The complainants case is that the complainant joined an insurance scheme of the 1st opposite party through 2nd opposite party who is the authorized agent of the 1st opposite party on payment of Rs.30,000/- on 14/03/2007. It is informed that the complainant had to pay Rs.30,000/- per year for 5 years and at the end of the 5th year the complainant will be entitled for a maturity value of Rs.1,69,119/- and also eligible for insurance coverage for Rs.2,00,000/- for the rest of the complainants life. On 21/03/2012 the complainant approached for reimbursement for the matured value. The 1st opposite party...
Esthar George and Others Vs. N.A. Raju, Proprietor, Omega Heritage Apa ...
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: May-09-2014
P.Q. Barkathali: President These appeals are filed by the complainants in CC.506/09 and CC.27/10 on the file of CDRF, Thrissur under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act challenging the order of the Forum dated, March 25, 2013 dismissing their complaint. 2. Complainants in both the complaints purchased flat from the 1st respondent/1st opposite party but the 1st opposite party has not so far issued occupancy certificate and obtained electric connection in domestic tariff and there are also deviation of the construction from the approved plan. Appellants in Appeal No.440/13 filed in CC.27/10 and the appellants in Appeal.441/13 filed in CC.506/09 before the Forum directing the opposite parties to issue occupancy certificate and electric connection in domestic tariff and also for a direction directing the first opposite party not to deviate from the approved plan. 3. First opposite party is the builder and 2nd and 3rd opposite parties are, Thrissur Corporation. They questioned the mai...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »