Kerala Court February 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paraman Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-04-2004
Reported in: 2004CriLJ3379; II(2004)DMC535
Abdul Gafoor, J.1. The sole accused in S. C. No. 17/98 on the file of the Sessions Court, Kozhikode is the appellant. He has been charged with offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed murder of his wife Pushpa. He has been found guilty under those counts and convicted. On the first count, he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and on the second count, he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Therefore this appeal.2. The prosecution case was that, on 15-3-1996 at about 5.30 p.m., the appellant/accused poured kerosene on his own wife Pushpa and set fire on her throwing a lighted match stick. The injured was taken to the Medical College Hospital, Calicut. While on treatment, she succumbed to the injuries on 22-3-1996 at about 4.15 p.m. It was also alleged that the appellant had been in the habit of causing mental and physical cruelty even prior to the occurrence towards his own wife, deceased ...
Tvs Srichakra Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-03-2004
Reported in: (2008)11VST748(Ker)
J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant-company is engaged in the manufacture of tyres, tubes and flaps for motor vehicles and is having the factory for the manufacture of these items in Tamil Nadu. The appellant is having sales depots throughout India. It is also having a purchase depot at Thiruvananthapuram for the purchase of rubber from the Kerala State. After purchase it is transferred to the head office at Madurai for the manufacture of the products. Government by Notification S.R.O. No. 767 of 98 exempted dealers other than manufacturers in including rubber cess in the turnover for the purpose of purchase tax for a limited period. Item 41 of the above exemption notification reads as follows:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------41. Dealers Part of the turno- 1. The rubber purchased was sold inter-other than ver being the State or transferred to the principal out-manufac- element of cess side the State or to a branch outside notturers and payable ...