Kerala Court December 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gracy Vs. Cleetus
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: I(2002)DMC401
R. Rajendra Babu, J. 1. The wife filed this O.P. for declaring her marriage with the respondent as null andvoid or, int he alternative, for dissolution of the marriage. It was alleged that themarriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 31.12.1986 atthe St. Antony's Church, Kannamaly, in accordance with the religious rites of theChristian community. A child was born to them in the wedlock. Later the petitionerleft for Gulf country seeking employment and used to visit only once in two years.During her return she was illtreated and assaulted by the respondent. Later it wasrevealed that the respondent was living with another lady. So the petition was filed fordeclaring the marriage null and void on the ground of fraud in obtaining the consent ofthe petitioner or, in the alternative, for dissolution of the marriage. 2. Though the respondent entered appearance, no counter was filed. 3. Later, the parties filed a joint petition C.M.P. 57169/2001 for dissolution ofthei...
Tata Tea Ltd. Vs. Director General of Foreign Trade
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: 2002(81)ECC689
M. Ramachandran, J. 1. The eligibility for Customs Duty concessions admissible under EXIM Policies inthe matter of imports made by the petitioner is the issue highlighted in this Writ Petition.2. The petitioner has challenged Ext. P3 letter dated 25.4.1991 issued by theController of Imports & Exports, New Delhi the text of which may be extractedherein:'With reference to your application No. BDL/1010/90 dated 20.12.1991 you are herebyinformed that your application was considered by Export Promotion Capital Goods Committeecarefully but the same could not be approved due to indigenous angle. As such your applicationis hereby rejected and you may approach indigenous suppliers for meeting your requirements....'.The names of suppliers were also given. Petitioner has also included a prayer forkeeping Ext. P11, an appeal filed by them before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 129A(1)of the Customs Act, 1962, in abeyance, during pendency of this Writ Petition.Sri. Joseph Kodianthara, learned ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›