Kerala Court April 2000 Judgments
Ummer Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3438
Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. This appeal is by Ummer (hereinafter referred to as accused) challenging conviction made and sentence to undergo imprisonment for life awarded by learned Sessions Judge, Palakkad for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, the Code).2. Prosecution case, in brief, is as follows : On 31-3-1995, at about 12 noon, at Alanallur-I Village, Vazhangalli Desom, on southern side of Alanallur-Vettathur public road, accused inflicted stab injuries with a dagger on various parts of the body of his elder brother Aboobacker (hereinafter referred to as deceased) allegedly on account of property dispute. At that time, deceased was waiting for the bus bound for Vettathur side. While he was under treatment at Al Shifa Hospital at Perintalmanna, he breathed his last at about 1-45 p.m. on the same day. P.W. 1 gave first information to the police, on the basis of which Crime No. 66 of 1995 was registered. After investigation, charge sheet was ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramla Vs. State of Kerala and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3088
Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. Questioning legality of detention order passed in respect of M. Andru (hereinafter referred to as 'detenu') in terms of Section 3(1)(ii) of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (in short 'the Act'), this Habeas Corpus Application has been filed by his wife. Grounds of detention reveal that on 1-7-1999, one YoosafKaipurathwas intercepted on his arrival at Calicut Airport by Air India Flight from Dubai and after his customs clearance through counter No. 1, on the reasonable belief that he was carrying non-duty paid gold and other contraband goods. In the presence of two independent witnesses, his travel documents and bag gages were examined. When he was asked whether he carried any dutiable items or gold, he replied in the negative. On reasonable belief that he had concealed undeclared gold in his baggage, Superintendent (Air Intelligence Unit), Calicut Airport requested two independent witnesses to witness the examinati...
Tag this Judgment!Victory Paper and Boards (India) Ltd. Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer, ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-03-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Ker278
Ar. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Heard Mr. Santhosh Mathew for the appellant and Mr. R. K. Muraleedharan, Government Pleader for the respondents.2. The writ appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 21st March, 2000. The appellant as petitioner challenged Ex. P4 assessment order and Exts. P3 and P7 demand notices Issued by the Tahslldar, Elappully, Palakkad. It is the case of the appellant that the appellant is a factory registered under the Factories and Boilers Act. Photocopy of the licence Issued in favour of the appellant by the Director of Factories and Boilers on 12-7-1999 was produced as Ext. P1 in the original petition. It is stated that the said licence is valid till 31-12-2000. It is submitted that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of uncoated paper and paper boards, namely, poster papers, blue match papers, manifold papers etc. Hence it is submitted that the appellant is a factory engaged in the manufacture of various kinds of papers and paper ...
Tag this Judgment!General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-03-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Ker250
Ar. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Heard Mr. C. N. Radhakrlshnan for the appellants and Mr. S. James Vincent for second respondent.2. The petitioners 2 to 3 in the Original Petition are the appellants in this appeal. The second respondent is a subscriber of a telephone. Consequent to the introduction of Electronic Exchange, the outstanding dues in respect of telephones were finalised and it was found that two telephone bills dated 11 -2-1992 for Rs. 350/- and bill dated 11-4-1992 for Rs. 454/- were found to be outstanding against the second respondent's telephone. The second respondent, like other subscribers, was also issued notice under Exhibit P3 dated 30-11-1995 requesting for payment of outstanding dues by 11-12-1995 so as to avoid disconnection of the telephone. Since the second respondent did not clear the arrears, the second appellant issued instruction under Exhibit P4 to make verification of payment and disconnect the telephone. The telephone was disconnected on 15-12-1995 as provided und...
Tag this Judgment!Koshy Varghese Vs. Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-03-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Ker363
Ar. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Heard Mr. S. Parameswaran for the appellant in W. A. No. 2505 of 1999 and the 1st respondent In W A. No. 2572 of 1999, and Mr. U. K. Ramakrishnan for the appellant in W. A. No. 2572 of 1999 and respondents 1 and 2 in W. A. No. 2505 of 1999.2. Both the appeals arise out of the judgment dated 12-10-1999 in O. P. No. 6659 of 1998. The appellant in W. A. No. 2505 of 1999 (Koshy Varghese) filed the original petition O. P. No. 6659 of 1998 for the following reliefs :--(A) A writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order directing the respondents to refer the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents referred to supra to arbitration to be arbitrated upon by any one among the panel of arbitrators submitted by the petitioner or by any other Retd. High Court Judge to be appointed by this Hon'ble Court as Arbitrator; or in the alternative. (B) A writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order directing the respondents to order convening of an High P...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›