Kerala Court June 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Raghunandanan Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-02-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Ker115
Thomas, J. 1. Though the provision isexplicit in the Constitution, it is seldom resorted to by parties aggrieved by interim ex parte orders passed by this Court in writ petitions. When it was pointed, in this writ appeal, to the counsel for the appellant that he could have availed himself of the benefit of the provision contained in Article 226(3) instead of challenging the interim order learned counsel has opted to do so. However, the writ appeal has to be disposed of by a judgment. 2. Appellant was the third respondent in an original petition filed by the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the KSRTC') under Article 226 of the Constitution in challenge of a judgment passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the STAT') on a civil miscellaneous petition filed along with the said original petition. Learned single Judge, before whom the original petition came up for admission, granted an interim order staying the operation of the judgment of the STAT. T...
A.L. Verghese S/O Lonapoan Vs. Registrar of Companies, Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-02-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Ker120
P.A. Mohammed, J.1. A company by name 'St. Antony's High School Samudayam Limited' incorporated under the provisionsof the Companies Act, 1956 on 3-1-1990. The copy of the Certificate of Incorporation granted to the company is Ext. P1. The main object of the company is to give financial assistance to manage schools and other educational institutions. Another object of the company is to carry on the business of conducting kuries (chitties) and advancing loans and to accept deposits subject to the provisions of Section 58-A of the Companies Act. The petitioners allege that the main object of the company was not introduced or implemented whereas the company had engaged in conducting kuries and daily financial matters. The petitioners further allege that St. Antony's High School had no connection whatsoever with the company and the name of the St. Antony's High School was used by the promoters in order to deceive the people and clandestinely to obtain subscribers to the chitty giving a fal...
Rani Joseph Vs. Registrar of Companies
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-02-1995
Reported in: [2001]103CompCas928(Ker); 1995CriLJ3832
P.V. Narayanan Nambiar, J.1. These cases were referred by Chettur Sankaran Nair J. to be heard by a Division Bench for an authoritative pronouncement as the correctness of the decision in Sudarsan Chits (India) Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies [1986] 59 Comp Cas 261 (Ker) was doubted.2. The petitioner and the respondent in all the four cases are one and the same. The respondent, Registrar of Companies, Kerala, filed complaints under Section 162 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'), for violation of certain provisions of the Act. These complaints are sought to be quashed by filing the Crl. M. Cs. ST 323 of 1992 of the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences). Ernakulam, and ST 326 of 1992 of the same court, which were filed for violation of Section 159 of the Act, are sought to be challenged in Crl. M. Cs. Nos. 1041 of 1992 and 1044 of 1992, respectively. In the other two cases, Crl. M. Cs. Nos. 1034 of 1992 and 1043 of 1992, proceedings in ST 324 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›