Kerala Court June 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishnakumar Vs. Anandan and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-05-1993
Reported in: AIR1994Ker175
G. Rajasekharan, J. 1. The first defendant in a suit for partition, is the appellant. 2. Plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3 are sons of one deceased Kumaranandan. Kumaranandan's father was Krishnanandan. In 1951, Krishnanandan and Kumaranandan together with the children then born to Kumaranandan, entered into Ext, A 1 styling it a partition deed. As per that partition deed, it isseen that the properties which belonged to Krishnanandan, having obtained in an earlier partition between himself and his brother, and the properties acquired by Krishnanandan as well as Kumaranandan, were put together and division or settlement effected. Properties were divided into six schedules, and A schedule to E schedule were set apart to the different parties to the deed. The F schedule was not allotted to any particular individual, but with respect to Items 1 and 2 in F schedule, a Trust was created and Item No. 3 was left in common for the benefit of the entire family. 3. The plaintiff who was a minor at ...
Kerala Solvent Extractions Ltd. Vs. A. Unnikrishnan and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-04-1993
Reported in: (1994)ILLJ442Ker
Jagannadha Rao, C.J.1. These two appeals are directed against the common judgment dated December 2, 1992, of the learned single Judge in O.P. Nos. 8348 of 1992 and 12063 of 1992 disposing of writ petitions. The appellant before us is the Kerala Solvent Extractions Ltd. In the writ petitions, the appellant questioned the correctness of the awards passed by the Labour Court in favour of the respondents workmen.2. The workmen in question in the two writ petitions were employed by the appellant-company as badli headload workers in godowns. A notice was issued as per Exhibit P-1 stating that only those persons who had studied upto VIII standard or below should apply. The workmen, who applied for employment stating that they had passed VII standard did not specifically mention that they had passed SSLC. It was only after their appointment that the appellant came to know that they had passed SSLC and that there was a violation of the notification. The appointments were made in the year 1988, ...
K.J. Sulatha and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-04-1993
Reported in: (1994)ILLJ997Ker
K.K. Usha, J.1. A vacancy in the post of clerk arose in Mutharamman Coil High School, Kottukalkonam, Neyyattinkara on January 1, 1984. Who is the rightful claimant to the above post, is the issue raised in these three original petitions. It was therefore agreed by all parties that the above three original petitions could be heard and disposed off together. While in O.P. 656/90 and 7737/90, Government Order dated January 15, 1990 issued in exercise of its power under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV-A of Kerala Education Rules is under challenge in toto, in O.P. 2005/90 challenge is restricted only to a portion of the order. Since almost all the relevant documents are produced in O.P. 7737/90 reference is made to exhibits as marked in O.P. 7737/90.2. Petitioner in O.P. 7737/90 is the Manager of the school. It is alleged that the educational agency is Hindu Nadar Mahajana Sangham, a Society registered under the Travancore Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Act, 1955. The Presiden...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›