Kerala Court May 1993 Judgments
C.P. Radhakrishnan Vs. CochIn Stock Exchange Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-31-1993
Reported in: [1994]80CompCas247(Ker)
P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.1. These appeals by the various defendants in O.S. No. 175 of 1993 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court of Ernakulam, challenge the order of injunction granted by the trial court restraining defendants Nos. 1 to 5 from starting, functioning or organising dealings or from functioning in securities in any manner from building Nos. 36/1602 to 36/1605 in Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, till the disposal of the suit. Defendant No. 1 in the suit is a company incorporated under the Companies Act and defendants Nos. 2 to 5 are its directors. The various appeals are filed by the directors challenging the order of the court below. No appeal as such has been filed by the first defendant-company. As noticed, these appeals directed against the interim injunction granted by the trial court came up before the vacation court on April 13, 1993. The plaintiff in the suit, the Cochin Stock Exchange Ltd. had filed caveats before this court and oppos...
Tag this Judgment!Vasudevan Vs. the State
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-31-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ3151
K.K. Usha, J.1. Many a young man and woman of Kerala could find life's oasis in the oil rich deserts of Gulf Countries. But, few unfortunates burned their wings in futile pursuit of the mirage. Vasudevan, the appellant, belongs to the second category. The effect of flow of oil money and the desperation of young men and women in acquiring visa and work permit to anyone of the Gulf Countries, on the social life of Keralites is a fertile ground for study by the social scientists. The crime, which is subject-matter of this appeal, is a bye-product of the phinomina.2. Aniyankunju alias Vijayananda Menon was reported missing from 27th September, 1980. The prosecution alleged that the appellant - first accused, Vasudevan, had murdered him and buried his body in the courtyard of the accused. Learned Sessions Judge found him guilty under Sections 302, 404 and 201 of Indian Penal Code. The second accused, Ponnamma, wife of the first accused, was found not guilty of the charges levelled against h...
Tag this Judgment!A Convict Prisoner in the Central Prison Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-31-1993
Reported in: 1993CriLJ3242
ORDERChettur Sankaran Nair, J.1. This case was registered on the basis of a petition sent to this Court, by a convict prisoner lodged in the Thiruvanan-thapuram Central Jail. He remains like many others - a nameless face in the pageant. According to him, the conditions prevailing in the prison where he is detained and in other prisons as well, are sub-human and have a trigger effect on crime and vice. He submits that some convicts enjoy the liberty to do what they like, making others feel indignant and rebellious. They get money through silent conduits in the jail and also Narcotic drugs. Often, the money is sent by criminals trained by them, who have served their term and gone out. Some jail officials connive with the prisoners. The case of one 'S.S.' who in league with two prison officials (since dismissed) committed robberies is pointed out. Another life convict 'M' who associated himself with habitual offenders committed an idol theft while on parole adds petitioner. Some of the ha...
Tag this Judgment!Palghat Exports Private Ltd. and P. Ramkumar Vs. T.V. Chandran and ors ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-26-1993
Reported in: [1994]79CompCas213(Ker)
Varghese Kalliath,J. 1. Both these appeals are against the judgment of the company judge in proceedings under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The appeal, M.F.A. No. 65 of 1993, is by respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 in the petition, C.P. No. 27 of 1988. The appeal, M.F.A. No. 64 of 1993 is by the fourth respondent in C.P. No. 27 of 1988, Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 in both the appeals are the same. Respondent No. 5 in M.F.A. No. 65 of 1993 is the appellant in M.F.A. No. 64 of 1993, and respondent No. 6 is the Union of India, represented by the Secretary, Company Law Administration, New Delhi. In M.F.A. No. 64 of 1993, respondent No. 5 is the company--the Palghat Exports Pvt. Ltd., 132/147, Shanmugha Road, Palghat. Respondent No. 6 is K. Santhosh Hebbar, managing director of the company. Respondent No. 7 is the chairman of the company and respondent No. 8 is the company director, L. Viswanathan. Respondent No. 9 is the Union of India, rep...
Tag this Judgment!Chandran M. and Etc. Vs. Election Commission of India, New Delhi and o ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-21-1993
Reported in: AIR1993Ker316
ORDERK. Narayana Kurup, J. 1. These two original petitions are being heard and disposed of by a common order at the admission stage itself. O.P. No. 6344/93 is treated as the main petition and the fate of the other petition (O.P. 6460/93) will depend upon the outcome of the main petition, namely, O.P. 6344/93. O.P. No. 6344/93 The battle at the hustings has now become a battle at the bar. The petitioner is a voter in the electoral rolls of the 8-Ottapalam (S.C.) Parliamentary Constituency in the State of Kerala. He is aggrieved by Ext.P 1 Notification No. 100/ KL--HP/1/92, dt. 8-5-1993 issued by the first respondent Election Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) amending its earlier Notification No. 100/ KL--HP/1/92(l) dated 19-4-1993. Under the earlier notification as aforesaid, which has been amended by Ext.PI, the poll to 8-Ottapalam (S. C.) Parliamentary Constituency was scheduled to be held on 19-5-1993, which, by virtue of the impugned Ext.P 1 notification, stand...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›