Kerala Court June 1986 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Sunil and ors. Vs. University of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-05-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Ker24
ORDERK. Sukumaran, J.1. These writ petitions are filed by the students who have joined the various Engineering Colleges for the Engineering Course under the University of Kerala. Regulation 11 framed by the University insists on a pass of all subjects in Semester numbers 3 and 4 for being admitted to 7th semester. The petitioners were not able to pass all the subjects of the semesters 3 and 4. They made a plea for relaxation. That was considered favourably by the Syndicate. A resolution was passed on 26-2-1986, by which it was resolved :'(ii) The VI Semester students who have not passed the III and IV Semesters be promoted to the VII Semester as a very special easel in relaxation of the existing Regulations.'2. Ordinarily, and without any other intervening factors, the petitioners would have been allowed to join the 7th Semester on the basis of the above decision of the Syndicate. The Vice-Chancellor of the University, however, felt that the resolution was beyond the competence of the ...
T.A. Rajendran Vs. Governor of Kerala and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-04-1986
Reported in: 1988CriLJ68
ORDERK. Sukumaran, J.1. This is yet another litigative adventure of the petitioner in the writ jurisdiction of this Court. The order assailed is that of the Governor of Kerala; and the person attacked is the Chief Minister. The State cabinet took a decision on 28-11-1985, sanctioning the issue of a licence for the establishment of a distillery for the manufacture of spirits. About two months later on 18-2-1986 the Chief Minister flew from Cochin to Calicut and back in a helicopter of the Indian Navy. These acts, according to the petitioner, constituted offences punishable under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The Chief Minister of a State cannot, however, be prosecuted for such offences, without the sanction of the Appointing Authority, which in the present case, is the Governor of Kerala. The petitioner made the necessary application on 25-2-1986. That was supplemented by other petitions submitted on 17-3-1986 and 12-4-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›