Kerala Court December 1983 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hajee K. Assainar and Co. Vs. Chacko Joseph
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-09-1983
Reported in: AIR1984Ker113
ORDERV. Bhaskaran Nambiar, J. 1. The tenant laced with an order of eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 2 of 1964, has filed this revision under Section 115 C.P.C.2. The brief facts are these. The ground floor of a building which is the subject-matter of the eviction proceedings belonged to the petitioner's father Joseph Chacko. Admittedly it was he who inducted petitioner as a tenant. The landlord, the father, transferred his rights in favour of the son, the respondent herein, under a registered deed Ext. A-1 dated 21-6-1979. The son demanded surrender by a registered notice dated 2-7-1980 (Ext. B-8) alleging bona fide need and thereafter riled this application for eviction. The authorities under the Act have found on the evidence that the respondent is entitled to eviction on the ground of bona fide need. These orders are challenged before me in this revision petition.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner however raised two contentions. (1) There is no ...
C.V. Karuppunni and ors. Vs. Joint Director, Inspection, Company Law B ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-07-1983
Reported in: [1986]59CompCas814(Ker)
Bhaskaran, Actg. C.J.1. W.A. No. 51 of 1982 is by Sri. C.V. Karuppunni, one of the directors of Sudarsan Trading Co. Ltd., Calicut, and is directed against the dismissal of his writ petition, O. P. No. 7197 of 1981 ; O.P. No. 77 of 1982 is by Sri. V. P. Balaram, chief executive of the said company ; and O. P. No. 3949 of 1982 is by Sri. M. Velayudhan, the managing director of the said company.2. Copies of the summons under Section 209A of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act), dated November 30, 1981, addressed to the petitioner in O. P. No. 77 of 1982, the second petitioner in O. P. No. 3949 of 1982 and the petitioner in O. P. No. 7197 of 1981 (the appellant in W. A. No. 51 of 1982), were respectively marked as Exts. P-1, P-14 and P-15 in the set of documents produced in O. P. No. 77 of 1982. In O. P. No. 3949 of 1982, the summons addressed to the second petitioner therein is marked exhibit P-1 ; and the summons addressed to the petitioner in O. P. No. 7197 of 1981 (the appellant in W. A....
Sankaran Sukumaran Vs. Krishnan Saraswathy and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-02-1983
Reported in: 1984CriLJ317
ORDERU.L. Bhat, J.1. The first respondent herein, claiming to be the legally wedded wife of the revision petitioner (first accused) and alleging that during the subsistence of the marriage revision petitioner married the second accused, which marriage is, but for the first marriage a valid marriage, filed a complaint against both the accused alleging the commission of an offence under Section 494, I.P.C., and Section 114, I. P. C. The accused pleaded not guilty. Prosecution examined four witnesses and marked Ext. P. 1. The defence marked Exts. D1 and D2. The trial Court held that both the marriages have been proved, that the ingredients of the offence under Section 494. I. P. C, have been proved against the first accused and accordingly convicted him thereunder and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The second accused has been acquitted on the ground that she must have acted under the belief that the first marriage had been dissolved under Ext, D2. While the a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›