Kerala Court August 1981 Judgments
Satyan Vs. State
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-05-1981
Reported in: 1981CriLJ1313
ORDERP. Janaki Amma, J.1. The petitioner is an accused in C. G. No. 112 of 1981 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class. Adoor, wherein offences under Sections 324, 326. 379 read with Section 34, I.P.C. are alleged against him and Ors.. When the petitioner moved for bail the -Magistrate dismissed the petition. The court proceeded on the footing that since an offence under Section 326. I.P.C. is punishable with imprisonment for life the court has no power to grant bail except in cases where the first proviso to Section 437 can be invoked. Aggrieved by the order refusing bail the petitioner has come up before this Court with an application under Section 439. Cr.P.C. He has been granted interim bail till the disposal of this petition.2. Ordinarily, a petitioner is expected to move for bail in this Court only after approaching the Sessions Judge. But it is noted that the learned Magistrate has given a wrong interpretation if, Section 437 (11 It is reported that in some ot...
Tag this Judgment!Agricultural Income-tax Officer and ors. Vs. Puthumoole Krishna Bhat
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-04-1981
Reported in: (1981)25CTR(Ker)349; [1982]133ITR532(Ker)
George Vadakkel, J.1. This is an appeal from the decision reported in Krishna Bhat v. Agrl. ITO : [1981]130ITR894(Ker) . The material facts necessary to understand the question raised herein are : 2. In respect of the agricultural income derived by the assessee from certain properties purchased by him and his six sons, he was, for the years 1966-67 to 1968-69, assigned the status of individual. He appealed and the AAC remanded the cases. He was then assessed for those years as one of the seven tenants-in-common, each entitled to 1/7th share. Exhibits P-2 to P-4 are the revised assessment orders for the said years. For the subsequent two years 1969-70 and 1970-71, also he was assessed as an individual. He appealed and the AAC had remitted these cases also. For the years 1971-72, 1972-73 arid 1974-75, the assessment proceedings were on the basis that the petitioner and his six children constituted an association of persons. Exhibits P-5 to P-7 are the assessment orders. The assessee appe...
Tag this Judgment!Koroth Sooppi Haji Vs. the Taluk Land Board, Tellicherry and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-03-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Ker219
ORDERU.L. Bhat, J.1. In the suo motu ceiling case against the revision petitioner, he has been directed to surrender 68 1/2 cents of excess land. This order is now challenged.2. Originally a draft statement was issued without receiving the intimation under Section 85 (7) of the Kerala Act 1 of 1964 (for short the 'Act'). Subsequently realising the defect of jurisdiction, the Taluk Land Board issued a revised draft statement. In the revised draft statement Sy, No. 151/2 was not included and only 51 cents in Sy. No. 17/2A was included. When the revision-petitioner filed objection a re-verification report was called for. In that report the authorised officer stated that the revision-petitioner is in possession of 54 cents in Sy. No. 17/2A as also 53 cents in Sy. No. 151/2. The Taluk Land Board accepted this version and included these extents in the final order without amending the draft statement or issuing a fresh draft statement The procedure adopted by the Taluk Land Board is clearly i...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›